Calculating Centripetal Force: From 1m to 100m in 100s with a 1kg Mass

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the centripetal force and the dynamics of a spinning mass as it transitions from a radius of 1 meter to 100 meters while maintaining a speed of 100 m/s. Participants explore the implications of changing tension in the tether and the relationship between linear and rotational motion.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how long it would take for a 1 kg mass to transition from a 1 m to a 100 m radius at a speed of 100 m/s while changing tension from 10000 N to 100 N.
  • Another participant questions the clarity of the initial question and suggests that the feasibility of the scenario is problematic, particularly regarding the mechanics of reeling in or out a tether.
  • A different participant proposes using Newton's equations and polar coordinates to solve the problem, presenting a system of equations related to the motion of the mass.
  • One participant expresses difficulty in understanding the equations provided and seeks a simpler explanation relating tension, speed, and radius.
  • Another participant inquires about the number of revolutions required to transition from a radius of 1 m to 100 m after changing tension, while also questioning the implications for kinetic energy if the radius were to become zero.
  • A follow-up comment emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between rotation and revolution, suggesting that the scenario might be better understood within the context of orbital mechanics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and agreement on the mechanics involved. There is no consensus on the feasibility of the scenario or the correct approach to solving the problem, with some participants providing mathematical frameworks while others seek simpler explanations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the practical implementation of the scenario, particularly the mechanics of changing the radius while maintaining speed and the implications for kinetic energy. The discussion also reflects a lack of clarity in the definitions used by participants.

aviator
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
how long would it take a spinning 1 kg mass to go from 1m to 100m radius at 100m/s by switching tension from 10000N to 100N?

the object is spinning and i would like to know how many revolutions would it take to go from a radius of 1 m to a radius of 100 m starting to count in the moment the tension is switched from 10000N to 100N

i would apreciate any formula
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question makes no sense. Please rephrase. Is this another tetherball question, related to your previous thread? If so, the answer depends on the length of the tether and the ball's rate of rotation about the center point - and you already know the equations involved.

Technically, the problem with your thought experiment is how you could do it in reality - being able to reel-in or reel-out a tether in the way you suggest is not an easy thing to accomplish.
 
Last edited:
Why don't try to solve Newton's equation :

The force on the point is along the rope, at 100 N...just use polar coordinates :

[tex]x=r(cos(\phi),sin(\phi)) -> v=r'(cos(\phi),sin(phi))+r\phi '(-sin(\phi),cos(\phi))[/tex]

so that the accel. is [tex]a=(r''-r\phi^{'2})(cos(\phi),sin(\phi))+(2r'\phi '+r\phi '')(-sin(\phi),cos(\phi))[/tex]

So that in your case : [tex]2r'\phi'+r\phi ''=0[/tex]

and [tex]r''-r\phi^{'2}=100[/tex]

Just solve the sys. of equation...this should be not so difficult I think
 
im afraid it seems dificult to me

i was expecting an answer like a quarter of revolution or something like that

i don't even know what stands for what in your equations

i just have one university year on physics and another in mechanics

i was expecting some equation that related the minor tension with the bigger tension and the constant speed and radius but i don't know which is which in your equations
 
if i have the ball spinning with a radius of 1 m at a speed of 100m/s to make it go from a radius of 1 m to a radius of 100m how many revolutions will it take after switching tension from 10000N to 100N?

i acomplish this by gearing the spin with the extension or retraction of the cable so the force of spin makes the cable extend or retract

on this way if the ball is going with a speed of 100m/s and a radius of 100 m and i gear it so the radius becomes 1 m the speed will keep constant of 100 m/s so kinetik energy is kept

what would happen if i make the radius 0 what would have happen to the kinetic energy of the ball?

shouldnt the ball be spinning in the axe to keep right the law of conservation of kinetic energy?

but then this means that linear speed can be transform into spin which makes no sense
 
aviator said:
shouldnt the ball be spinning in the axe to keep right the law of conservation of kinetic energy?

but then this means that linear speed can be transform into spin which makes no sense
I never actually noticed this in your previous posts, but it seems to me from this one that you're failing to differentiate between rotating and revolving when you use the word 'spinning'. If the thing that you're talking about is tethered to an axe (and I've always taken this to mean axle), then its rotation and revolution periods would match. It would essentially be tide locked to the axle. It's the same basic idea that explains the Moon keeping the same side toward us. In fact, you might be better off if you put your entire hypothesis into an orbital mechanics problem to start with, then work out whatever Earthbound modifications are required.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K