Help with Linear Algebra: Find Solutions & Verify

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around linear algebra concepts, specifically focusing on eigenvector decomposition and least squares solutions. The original poster seeks clarification on expressing a sequence defined by a matrix equation and verifying the existence of infinitely many solutions for a given system of equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to express the sequence x_{n} based on eigenvectors and eigenvalues but questions whether their interpretation aligns with the problem's requirements. They also explore the verification of least squares solutions and express confusion regarding their calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's reasoning, questioning the formulation of the sequence and the approach to the least squares problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for dependence on n in the sequence expression, and the least squares requirement has been highlighted as potentially overlooked.

Contextual Notes

The original poster's attempts include specific matrix manipulations and expressions that may not fully adhere to the problem's constraints or requirements. There is an indication of a misunderstanding regarding the least squares method and its application in the context provided.

shan
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
This first one, I just want to verify that I've understood what the question is asking.

It says: If [tex]x_{n+1} = Ax_{n}[/tex], write an expression for [tex]x_{n}[/tex]. The matrix A = [tex]\left(\begin{array}{ccc}2&0&0\\1&3&0\\-3&5&4\end{array}\right)[/tex]

From what I understand, this question wants me to do an eigenvector decomposition so this is what I came up with (after finding the eigenvectors and eigenvalues):
[tex]x_{n} = c_{1}(4 * \left(\begin{array}{c}0\\0\\1\end{array}\right)) + c_{2}(3 * \left(\begin{array}{c}0\\\frac{-1}{5}\\1\end{array}\right)) + c_{3}(2 * \left(\begin{array}{c}\frac{1}{4}\\\frac{-1}{4}\\1\end{array}\right))[/tex]
Is that what the question was asking for?? :confused:

The other question (or help I need) is this one: Verify that there are infinitely many least squares solutions which are given by x = [tex]\left(\begin{array}{c}\frac{2}{7}\\\frac{13}{84}\\0\end{array}\right) + t \left(\begin{array}{c}\frac{-1}{7}\\\frac{5}{7}\\1\end{array}\right)[/tex]
It's talking about this system...
[tex]\left(\begin{array}{ccc}3&1&1\\2&-4&10\\-1&3&-7\end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{c}x_{1}\\x_{2}\\x_{3}\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{c}2\\-2\\1\end{array}\right)[/tex]

I multiplied both sides by the inverse of the matrix and got this system:
[tex]\left(\begin{array}{ccc}14&-8&30\\-8&26&-60\\30&-60&150\end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{c}x_{1}\\x_{2}\\x_{3}\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{c}-1\\13\\-25\end{array}\right)[/tex]
and I then row reduced it to..
[tex]\left(\begin{array}{cccc}14&-8&30&1\\0&\frac{150}{7}&\frac{-300}{7}&\frac{95}{7}\\0&0&0&0\end{array}\right)[/tex]
I thought I was going on the right track since I can see that this has infinitely many solutions but when I tried to find x...
[tex]x_{3} = t[/tex]
[tex]x_{2} = \frac{19}{30} + 2t[/tex]
[tex]x_{1} = \frac{13}{30} - t[/tex]
which definitely does not verify the above question. Can someone tell me where I went wrong? Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]x_{n} = c_{1}(4 * \left(\begin{array}{c}0\\0\\1\end{array}\right)) + c_{2}(3 * \left(\begin{array}{c}0\\\frac{-1}{5}\\1\end{array}\right)) + c_{3}(2 * \left(\begin{array}{c}\frac{1}{4}\\\frac{-1}{4}\\1\end{array}\right))[/tex]

Did you notice that there is no "n" in that? Are you claiming that xn is constant and does not depend on n? There should be some nth powers in there.

In (2) you've completely neglected the "least squares" requirement.
 
HallsofIvy said:
[tex]x_{n} = c_{1}(4 * \left(\begin{array}{c}0\\0\\1\end{array}\right)) + c_{2}(3 * \left(\begin{array}{c}0\\\frac{-1}{5}\\1\end{array}\right)) + c_{3}(2 * \left(\begin{array}{c}\frac{1}{4}\\\frac{-1}{4}\\1\end{array}\right))[/tex]

Did you notice that there is no "n" in that? Are you claiming that xn is constant and does not depend on n? There should be some nth powers in there.

Ah, I think I see what you mean... so should it have been more like..
[tex]x_{n} = 4^(n+1) c_{1} \left(\begin{array}{c}0\\0\\1\end{array}\right) + 3^(n+1) c_{2} \left(\begin{array}{c}0\\\frac{-1}{5}\\1\end{array}\right) + c^(n+1) c_{3} \left(\begin{array}{c}\frac{1}{4}\\\frac{-1}{4}\\1\end{array}\right)[/tex]

In (2) you've completely neglected the "least squares" requirement.
What do you mean by that? I thought that to solve a least squares problem, you use [tex]A^T Ax = A^T b[/tex] where x represents the unknowns, in this case, x1, x2 and x3?
 
Oops, nevermind about the second question, I figured it out :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K