Meteorite heading towards earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter josephcollins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Meteorite
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a meteorite's collision with Earth, focusing on its mass, initial velocity, and the calculations related to its final velocity upon impact. The subject area includes concepts of kinetic energy, gravitational potential energy, and the dynamics of celestial objects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate the change in kinetic energy to gravitational potential energy to find the final velocity of the meteorite. Some participants question the reasoning behind specific calculations, particularly the division by 2 in the energy equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and questioning the assumptions made in the calculations. There is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the original poster's approach, but guidance is being offered regarding the energy relationships involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the implications of the meteorite's speed and the potential for high-velocity impacts, raising questions about the nature of meteoroids and their behavior upon entering the Earth's atmosphere.

josephcollins
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Hi ppl. I have a short question. A meteorite of mass m has a velocity u=2.00*10^4 m/s when it is at an infinite distance from the earth. It eventually collides with the eath with a velocity v. Calculate v. given are the radius of earth(6.37*10^6m) and go=9.80Nkg^-1)

I used the argument that the change in kinetic energy is going to be equal to 0.5m(v^2-u^2) which also equals GMem/2Re which resolves to goRem/2. Equating and calculating gives 2.15*10^4m/s. Could someone verify that this is correct and that potential energy or total energy is not neglected in my reasoning? thanks, joe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
josephcollins said:
I used the argument that the change in kinetic energy is going to be equal to 0.5m(v^2-u^2) which also equals GMem/2Re which resolves to goRem/2.
I don't see why you divided by 2. (The change in PE should equal [itex]g R_e m[/itex])
 
Last edited:
Wow! That meteorite had quite the bounce to it to achieve that high and fast of an arc, don't you think?

Or perhaps your prof meant meteor?

;)
 
I'll bet the prof meant meteoroid on its way to becoming a meteorite. (If the meteoroid burns up--becoming a "shooting star"--then it would be a meteor.)

Regardless, that's one heck of a meteoroid to make it through the atmosphere with no apparent loss of mass. :smile:
 
Most scenarios seem to imply that massive objects hitting our planet would be traveling at a speed that would give days if not weeks of warning.

Is there any reason that a meteor should not hit the Earth at a very high relative velocity? Even one traveling at 80% the speed of light would be difficult to see coming, and hence be something of a surprise!
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K