How to calculate this determinate

  • Thread starter Thread starter jdstokes
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the determinant of the function defined as f_n(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n), which is structured as a Vandermonde matrix. The key conclusion is that f_n can be expressed as a polynomial in x_1 with coefficients derived from the cofactors of the first column, specifically g_{n-1} = (-1)^{n-1}f_{n-1}(x_2, x_3, ..., x_n). Additionally, it is established that f_n(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n) has x_i - x_1 as a factor for all i from 2 to n, confirming the polynomial's structure and factorization properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of determinants and their properties
  • Familiarity with polynomial expressions and coefficients
  • Knowledge of the Laplace expansion method for calculating determinants
  • Basic concepts of Vandermonde matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Vandermonde determinants in detail
  • Learn about polynomial factorization techniques in algebra
  • Explore advanced applications of the Laplace expansion method
  • Investigate the implications of determinant properties in linear algebra
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying linear algebra, and anyone interested in advanced determinant calculations and polynomial theory.

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Let [itex]n[/itex] be a positive integer, and define the function

[itex]f_n(x_1,x_2,\ldots, x_n) = \left( <br /> \begin{array}{ccccc}<br /> 1 & 1 & 1 & \ldots & 1 \\<br /> x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & \ldots & x_n \\<br /> x_1^2 & x_2^2 & x_3^2 & \ldots & x_n^2 \\<br /> \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\<br /> x_1^{n-1} & x_2^{n-1} & x_3^{n-1} & \ldots & x_n^{n-1}<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/itex]

(b) By considering the first column expansion of the determinant, show that

[itex]f_n(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_2) = g_0 + g_1x_1 + g_2x_1^2 + \cdots + g_{n-1}x_1^{n-1}[/itex], and, in particular, [itex]g_{n-1}=(-1)^{n-1}f_{n-1}(x_2,x_3,\ldots,x_n)[/itex]

(c) Show that [itex]f_n(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_2)[/itex] has [itex]x_i-x_1[/itex] as a factor, for all values of [itex]i[/itex] from 2 to [itex]n[/itex].

I think I've sorted part (b) out. I don't have a clue about how to proceed in part (c).

Thanks.

James
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you have

[tex]f_n(x_1,x_2,\ldots,\mathbf{x_2}) = g_0 + g_1x_1 + g_2x_1^2 + \cdots + g_{n-1}x_1^{n-1}[/tex]

Do you mean

[tex]f_n(x_1,x_2,\ldots,\mathbf{x_n}) = g_0 + g_1x_1 + g_2x_1^2 + \cdots + g_{n-1}x_1^{n-1}[/tex]

I'm not exactly sure if this will work, but write [itex]f_n[/itex] as a polynomial in [itex]x_1[/itex] with coefficients [itex]g_0,\, \dots ,\, g_{n-1}[/itex]. You should be able to write these coefficients (or, at least one of them) in terms of [itex]f_{n-1}[/itex], which you can in turn write as a polynomial in [itex]x_2[/itex]. You'll get something with [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex] in there, and hopefully you'll be able to factor it to get the desired results. You should end up with new coefficients for which you can do something similar, working in all the [itex]x_i[/itex] and then hopefully being able to factor.

Alternatively, treat [itex]f_n(x_1,\, \dots ,\, x_n)[/itex] as the single-variable polynomial [itex]f_{n-x_2,\dots ,x_n}(x_1)[/itex]. If [itex]f_n[/itex] is supposed to factor as it suggests in part c), then so should this new polynomial. But this polynomial is of degree n-1, and the problem suggests that you can pull out n-1 factors, so if what you are supposed to prove is correct, then the new polynomial should be a constant multiplied by the product of those factors. This doesn't seem exactly right because your coefficients are matrices, but the roots you're finding are whatever [itex]x_1[/itex] is, but you may want to try this approach. Take the product of those factors, and multiply it by [itex]g_{n-1}[/itex] and see if you end up with [itex]f_n[/itex].
 


To calculate the determinant of the given function, we can use the Laplace expansion method. This involves expanding the determinant along one row or column and using cofactors to solve for the determinant. In this case, we will use the first column expansion.

First, we can see that the determinant is a polynomial in x_1, with degree n-1. This means it can be written as g_0 + g_1x_1 + g_2x_1^2 + \cdots + g_{n-1}x_1^{n-1}. We can also see that the coefficients of this polynomial are determined by the cofactors of the first column.

Using the Laplace expansion, we can write the determinant as:

f_n(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n) = x_1 \cdot \left(
\begin{array}{ccccc}
x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & \ldots & x_n \\
x_2^2 & x_3^2 & x_4^2 & \ldots & x_n^2 \\
\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
x_2^{n-1} & x_3^{n-1} & x_4^{n-1} & \ldots & x_n^{n-1}
\end{array}
\right)

Now, we can see that this is just the determinant of f_{n-1}(x_2,x_3,\ldots,x_n), with x_1 as a common factor. This means that g_{n-1} is equal to (-1)^{n-1} times the determinant of f_{n-1}(x_2,x_3,\ldots,x_n).

For part (c), we can use the same method of Laplace expansion to show that x_i-x_1 is a factor of f_n(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n). Expanding along the i-th column, we get:

f_n(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n) = (x_i-x_1) \cdot \left(
\begin{array}{ccccc}
1 & 1 & 1 & \ldots & 1 \\
x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & \ldots &
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K