The Anthropic Multiverse Origin of Life

AI Thread Summary
Quantum measurement by a self-replicating biomolecule is proposed as a pivotal event in the emergence of life, suggesting that peptide addition within the first proto-cell occurred not in a classical universe but within a multiverse of all possible states. Each addition of a peptide represents a branching point in which the peptide chain evolves in multiple directions simultaneously, expanding the multiverse with each addition. Once a branch resulted in a self-replicating peptide, quantum measurement became inevitable, leading to decoherence that fragmented the quantum tree into 20^32 separate branches, each representing a different universe. Only one of these universes contained the self-replicator, marking the emergence of life. This interpretation draws from JohnJoe McFadden's book "Quantum Evolution," which explores the intersection of quantum mechanics and biological evolution.
dwilkerson
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
"Quantum measurement by a self-replicating biomolecule was the key event that caused life to emerge."

Try to follow me on this:

"Using the Many Worlds approach, peptide addition within the first (proto-) cell would have taken place, not in a classical universe, but within the multiverse of all possible states."

"Each peptide addition was a multiple branch point where the growing peptide chain evolved in all directions simultaneously. The multiverse expanded with every addition to the peptide chain as the quantum tree of possibilities grew in every direction."

"But once one branch lighted upon a self-replicating peptide, then quantum measurement would have become inevitable. Decoherence shattered the unity of the quantum tree, which split into 20^32 separate branches, each representing a different universe. Only one of the 20^32 descendent universes harboured the self-replicator, but in that one universe life emerged."

The 20^32 is the amount of ways possible to put together peptides 32 amino acids long.


Please comment on what you think about this interpretation of how life first emerged. All of this was taken from molecular geneticist JohnJoe McFadden's book Quantum Evolution.
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
Is the above a direct quote from the book, or your paraphrased interpretation of it? Just for copyright issues, if it's a quote, please put it in quote tags and provide the full citation for the book.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top