Subset Span Proof: Proving W is a Subspace of V with Span(W) = W

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zmdeez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Span
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a subset W of a vector space V is a subspace of V if and only if the span of W equals W. The scope includes theoretical aspects of vector spaces and subspaces, as well as the definitions and implications involved in the proof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for guidance on proving that W is a subspace of V if and only if span(W) = W.
  • Another participant inquires which direction of the implication can be shown, suggesting that the result follows directly from definitions.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about their ideas and suggests that one direction of the proof may be simpler than the other but struggles to find a starting point.
  • Definitions of a vector subspace and the span of a subset are discussed, with one participant stating that W is a subspace if it is closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
  • It is noted that showing W is closed under finite combinations of its elements implies it is closed under adding two elements, raising a question about the converse implication.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty and differing levels of understanding regarding the proof. There is no consensus on how to approach the proof or which direction is simpler.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference definitions that may depend on the underlying field (e.g., R or C) and discuss the implications of closure under addition and scalar multiplication without resolving the mathematical steps involved.

zmdeez
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
show that a subset W of vector space V is a subspace of V iff span(W)=W

Can anyone help guide me along in this proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which of the directions of implication can you show, if any? The result follows from the definitions of all the words involved directly.
 
i have sketched a couple ideas but i don't think they are legit...so i guess i can't show either direction, I am sure one is far simpler than the other i just can't get a good start
 
What is (your) definition of a vector subspace? Mine is that W is a subspace if W is a subset of V and for all x and y in W and s and t in R (or whatever the underlying field is, perhaps C) the sx+ty is in W and 0 is in W. (note this is redundant by settinf s=t=0)
What is the span of a subset? iti s the set of all combinations

[tex]t_1x_1+\ldots t_nx_n[/tex]

for t_i in R (or the underlying field) and x_i in W
so W=span(W) means exactly that all finite combinations of elements of W are in W.

so we are trying to show that

W closed under combining (adding up) two elements of itself if and only if W is closed under combining a finite number of elements of itself.

Obvioulsy one way is simple: if i can add up any number of combinations of elements then i can in particular add up two of them. Conversely...?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K