Thread Closed

Non-integral bases?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Aug6-05, 10:32 PM   #1
 

Non-integral bases?


Apologies if this is in the wrong forum.

In a discussion we're having on our compsci forums at uni, about binary numbers, someone brought up the notion of non-integral bases. I take it to mean numbers with bases that aren't integers. Is this right?

I've never encountered such a thing before, so I'm curious about it. I've only seen bases defined as integers - is it valid to think of non-integral bases? Do the same processes for understanding and converting integer bases apply to non-integers?

I have no specific questions, really. How does it work? How is it meaningful? What are some applications of it? Links to further information would be nice.

Searching the web turns up almost no information about this, so I wonder if it goes by any other names too.

Thanks to anyone who can shed some light on the matter.
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Heat-related deaths in Manhattan projected to rise
>> Dire outlook despite global warming 'pause': study
>> Sea level influenced tropical climate during the last ice age
Aug7-05, 12:57 AM   #2
AKG
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
No, I believe it's problematic. Imagine taking base [itex]\pi[/itex]. Then [itex]\pi[/itex] would have a finite [itex]\pi[/itex]-ary expansion. What's worse is that it doesn't make sense to use decimals in this case. When you have a base n, then the digits in your expansion can take values from {0, 1, .., n-1}. What if you have base [itex]\pi[/itex]? There's no reasonable choice.
 
Aug7-05, 02:41 AM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
This can be done.
call our base b
1234(base b)=1*b^3+2*b^2+3*b+a
as usual digits are chosen as integers such that 0<=digit<=b
any positive real except one can be used as a base.
The two main problems that arise are
1) accuracy can become an issue and rational numbers have not reapeating decimal expansions.
2) non uniqueness. This has to do with algebraic bases.
2=10=1.01010101010101010101... (base sqrt(2))
4=10000=100=11.010000010010... (base sqrt(2))
here are some things in base pi
pi=10 (base pi)
e=2.2021201002111122001 (base pi)
17=120.2200211010202300
 
Aug7-05, 02:43 AM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help

Non-integral bases?


Quote by AKG
No, I believe it's problematic. Imagine taking base [itex]\pi[/itex]. Then [itex]\pi[/itex] would have a finite [itex]\pi[/itex]-ary expansion. What's worse is that it doesn't make sense to use decimals in this case. When you have a base n, then the digits in your expansion can take values from {0, 1, .., n-1}. What if you have base [itex]\pi[/itex]? There's no reasonable choice.
pi=10 (base pi) is not a problem
Even though the base is nonintegral the digits are still integers.
 
Aug24-05, 11:06 AM   #5
 
but the concept raises an interesting question : what can you say about a number wich has a periodic development in base pi ?
such as a = 1.0101010101(base pi) = pi+pi^3+pi^5+...
it is tempting to name those numbers "rationals in base pi"
However, they look like p-adic numbers, because of the infinite right part.
They also look like elements of an hilbert space, or infinite polynomials in pi

what about addition, multiplication, ... of those numbers ? is there a closed operation ?
 
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Non-integral bases?
Thread Forum Replies
Example of a substance that is a Bronsted-Lowry, but not Arrhenius Chemistry 3
More bases Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Bases Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Bases Linear & Abstract Algebra 4
Bases General Math 24