Transformer Loading: Relationships & Calculations

  • Thread starter Thread starter temujin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformer
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The relationships for transformer loading, specifically the equations Vsec/Vpri = Nsec/Npri and Isec/Ipri = Nsec/Npri, do not hold when the diameters of the windings differ due to the influence of parasitic inductance, capacitance, and resistance. To achieve a more accurate model, it is essential to incorporate leakage inductance, winding resistance, and inter-winding capacitance into the calculations. These factors significantly affect the performance and characteristics of the transformer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transformer principles and basic electrical engineering concepts
  • Familiarity with parasitic elements in electrical circuits
  • Knowledge of inductance and capacitance calculations
  • Experience with transformer modeling techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research leakage inductance and its impact on transformer performance
  • Study winding resistance and its effect on secondary current calculations
  • Learn about inter-winding capacitance and its role in transformer design
  • Explore advanced transformer modeling techniques using simulation software
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, transformer designers, and students studying power systems will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on improving transformer efficiency and accuracy in calculations.

temujin
Messages
46
Reaction score
1
dear all,

When loading the secondary winding of a transformer, my textbook gives the following relationships:
[tex]\frac{V_{sec}}{V_{pri}}=\frac{N_{sec}}{N_{pri}}\\[/tex]
and
[tex]\frac{I_{sec}}{I_{pri}}=\frac{N_{sec}}{N_{pri}}\\[/tex]

Do these relationships hold also when the diameter of the windings are different?
I suspect they don´t...If they do not, are there any other relationships I can use to calculate I and V in the secondary winding?


regards
t.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Those are the simple first-order relationships, and as you suspect, they ignore parasitic inductance, capacitance and resistance, as well as core material issues. I did a quick google search, and pages like this one are pretty common:

http://www.beigebag.com/case_xfrmer_2.htm

Depending on lots of stuff, you can make your model a lot more accurate by including at least the leakage inductance and winding resistance (both are in series with the magnetizing inductance), and also the inter-winding capacitance of each winding (put in parallel with the magnetizing inductance of each winding). The N1:N2 transformation only applies to the magnetizing inductance components of this model.

Hope that helps, -Mike-
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K