Perhaps delta function or inverse Laplace transform?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a differential equation involving an integral and the Dirac delta function, specifically focusing on the application of Laplace transforms to solve for the function i(t). The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to begin tackling the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest various methods, including taking the derivative of the entire equation to eliminate the integral and applying Laplace transforms directly. There are questions about how to handle the function i(t) in the context of the Laplace transform, particularly regarding the presence of the unit step function u(t).

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights and suggestions for approaching the problem, including the use of integration by parts and the convolution theorem. However, there is no explicit consensus on the best method to proceed, and the discussion remains open with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that the last topics covered in their studies were Laplace transforms and the Dirac delta function, indicating a potential gap in their understanding of how to apply these concepts to the current problem.

EvLer
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
i have this question and not even sure how to approach it:

[tex]\frac {di}{dt}+4i+3\int_{0^-}^t{i(z)dz = 12(t-1)u(t-1)[/tex]

and [tex]i(0^-) = 0[/tex]

find [tex]i(t)[/tex]

last topics we covered were laplace transforms (and inverse) and dirac delta function.
At least some hint to get me started would be a great help.

EDIT:
oh, and again u(t) = 1 for t >= 0 and u(t) = 0 elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would get rid of the integral by taking the derivative of the entire equation - which gives you a second order differential equation and leads you into the LaPlace transform.
 
Laplace transform the equation directly. To find the transform of the integral, just do an integration by parts. That will avoid complications on the right side. :)
 
thanks for replies, as i looked further through the book, we actually have an entry in the table for this integral, but what do I do with [tex]i[/tex] for Laplace transform? it does not have u(t)...
 
Ev,

I presume that your goal is to solve for i(t). After performing the Laplace transforms, you will have an algebraic equation for I(s). The right side will have two terms. One will relate to the initial value of i and the other will be a product of an algebraic quantity with the Laplace transform of the integral containing u. You should have no difficulty inverting the first part and you should be able to do something with the second using the convolution theorem for Laplace transforms.

Let us know what you end up with!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K