Writing Equations without LaTeX on Forums

  • Context: LaTeX 
  • Thread starter Thread starter amcavoy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Latex Writing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods of writing equations in forum posts without using LaTeX, exploring alternatives that may be cleaner and easier to integrate into text. Participants discuss various coding options and formatting techniques available on the forum.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that some posts use a text-editor style for equations, suggesting it appears cleaner and easier to incorporate into sentences.
  • Another participant humorously questions the meaning of a previous post, indicating a light-hearted tone in the discussion.
  • A participant explains that special tags and character codes can be used for formatting equations, detailing the structure of these tags and where to find them.
  • It is mentioned that there are two sets of TeX tags available on the forum, with one set designed for inline use, which may enhance readability within sentences.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying preferences for formatting equations, with some favoring text-editor styles and others advocating for the use of TeX tags. No consensus is reached on the best method.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the potential for confusion regarding which tags or codes are most effective, as well as the need for users to familiarize themselves with the forum's specific formatting options.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for forum users interested in enhancing their posts with equations, particularly those looking for alternatives to LaTeX formatting.

amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
I have seen some posts here where people write equations similar to how they would be written in a text-editor (subscripts, superscripts, etc.) rather than in LaTeX. It seems a little "cleaner" and easier to incorporate into a sentence. Is there a certain type of code for this on these forums or is it done by copy-and-paste?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]\mbox{what d_o \ yo^u \ mean?}[/tex] :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
You can use special tags, which are part of PF, or you can use some character codes, which can be used anywhere.

Some tags: superscript, subscript, and maybe some others. These have the form [ tag ] your text [/ tag ][/color], without the spaces. To see them, just quote the person's post. The tags that they used will show up in the quoted message.

Some code: ∀x(Px → ¬Qx), Gödel. These have the form & # numbers ;[/color] or & letters ;[/color], without the spaces. For example, & # 172 ; [/color] and & rarr ;[/color]. To see these, right-click on the page and select View Source (or View Page Source). To find the code, you just have to search (use your browser's Find tool). You can also find these codes online; Just google 'character code OR sets' for a start. For the codes that will work for the most people on PF, add 'iso' to your search. :smile:
 
apmcavoy said:
It seems a little "cleaner" and easier to incorporate into a sentence.

FYI we have not one, but two sets of TeX tags. One of them (called "inline TeX") is meant to fit neatly into a sentence. Check it out.

Using [ tex ]...[ /tex ] tags (without the spaces):

Einstein said that [tex]E=mc^2[/tex].

Looks icky in a sentence, right?

Now use [ itex ]...[ /itex ] tags (again, without the spaces):

Einstein said that [itex]E=mc^2[/itex].

NOW how much would you pay? Wait, don't answer yet, we'll even throw in this FREE set of GinsuTM steak knives! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K