How Do You Calculate the Equation of an Hourglass Curve?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ssj5harsh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the equation of an hourglass curve, with specific parameters such as diameter, height, and the time for sand to empty. The subject area includes geometry and potentially calculus, as participants explore the mathematical representation of a three-dimensional shape.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks guidance on how to begin calculating the equation, expressing uncertainty about the relationship between the known parameters and the shape. Some participants discuss various mathematical functions and representations, questioning their correctness and applicability to the hourglass shape.

Discussion Status

Participants are sharing different mathematical approaches and functions, with some expressing uncertainty about their validity. There is an ongoing exploration of how to represent the hourglass mathematically, but no consensus has been reached regarding the correct method or equation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the shape of the hourglass can vary, which may affect the equations being considered. There is also mention of scaling and experimental trial and error in relation to the choice of sand, indicating potential constraints in the problem setup.

ssj5harsh
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I need to find the equation of the curve of an hourglass. Known: diameter, height. Time taken for the sand to be completely emptied is 1 minute. I would like it if someone would tell me where or how to start. I can't think of anything.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The curve of an hourglass? An hourglass can be many different shapes, starting with a cone. The information you give as "known" has nothing to do with the shape.
 
i was looking for the same thing today and came across this question

what i came up with was a combination of 8 functions for a 3d representation, although i am not certain if they are correct. also of note is that this is for it laying on its side. anyway, here goes:

x = y3 + z3 + 1, For x, 0 to h
-x = y3 + z3 + 1, For x, -h to 0
-x = -y3 + z3 + 1, For x, -h to 0 (?)
x = -y3 + z3 + 1, For x, 0 to h (?)
x = y3 + z3 - 1, For x, -h to 0
-x = y3 + z3 - 1, For x, 0 to h
-x = -y3 + z3 - 1, For x, 0 to h (?)
x = -y3 + z3 - 1, For x, -h to 0 (?)

where 2h = height of hourglass

from here it (should) should just be a matter of scaling, choosing of sand, and experimental trial and error to come up with the correct amount of the particularly chosen sand.

again, am not sure if this is correct. . . .

Best Regards,
 
Last edited:
whoops, let's try this again. . . .

f(y,z) = n(y3 + z3) + a; For y = 0, and positive y; For x, 0 to h
f(y,z) = n(-y3 - z3) - a; For negative y; For x, -h to 0
f(y,z) = n(y3 - z3) - a; For negative y; For x, -h to 0
f(y,z) = n(-y3 + z3) + a; For y = 0, and positive y; For x, 0 to h
f(y,z) = n(y3 + z3) - a; For negative y; For x, 0 to h
f(y,z) = n(-y3 - z3) + a; For y = 0, and positive y; For x, -h to 0
f(y,z) = n(y3 - z3) + a; For y = 0, and positive y; For x, -h to 0
f(y,z) = n(-y3 + z3) - a; For negative y; For x, 0 to h

where h = 1/2 hourglass height,
a = the cubed root of the hourglass annulous radius,
and
n = a height to width coefficient
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
8K