Electrostatic force and virtual photon exchange

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the electrostatic force and its explanation through the exchange of virtual photons, particularly in the context of quantum electrodynamics (QED). Participants explore how to simplify complex concepts for educational purposes, aiming to derive expressions that relate to the electrostatic force without delving into advanced mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Luca expresses difficulty in explaining the electrostatic force as arising from virtual photon exchange and seeks simplified expressions for momentum and time related to this exchange.
  • Some participants suggest that using perturbation theory may not be suitable for creating bound states in this context.
  • There is a desire to present quantum concepts in a way that is accessible to high school students, using plain algebra rather than calculus.
  • One participant references A. Zee's book as a source that discusses the energy of two charges using QFT methods, although it is noted that the book employs calculus, which may not be appropriate for the intended audience.
  • Luca indicates an interest in finding simpler algebraic expressions that could lead to the formula F = dp/dt, where dp represents average momentum exchanged and dt represents the average number of virtual photons exchanged per unit time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus on how to derive simple expressions for the electrostatic force from virtual photon exchange. Multiple viewpoints exist regarding the complexity of the topic and the appropriate methods for explanation.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the audience's mathematical background and the complexity of QED concepts. The reliance on perturbation theory and the challenge of simplifying advanced topics without losing essential details are also noted.

Luca
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,
although being graduated in physics (but not being an expert on QED) I find myself embarassed in trying to explain in very simple terms how the electrostatic force arise from the exchange of virtual photon. Especially when it comes to actually reduce all calculations to the expected result F = k q^2/ r^2
Myself I fall in the trap of a lot of complexities about series expansions in term of powers of 1/137, etc. etc. but without being able to sum up all of those fine concepts into a simple formula such as:
F = dp/dt
where:
dp = average momentum exchanged / each virtual photon exchange
1/dt = average number of virtual photon exchanged / unit of time

Considering only the static case, and limiting to the first term (i.e.: single photon exchange), and accepting to sacrifice some of the formal rigour, if it could be possible to obtain simple approximated expressions for dp and dt in terms of 1/r^2 and fine structure constant, that would also help a lot when trying to popularise at least the fundamental concepts.
Oddly, all my efforts to find this in textbooks have failed.
Is somebody interested in helping to derive such simple approximated expressions for dp and dt ?

Thanks for the help

Luca
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe the problem is in using perturbation theory to create a bound state rather than to perturb a free state (or an already bound state).

The chemists seem to approach this sort of thing by way of density matrices. I'm not sure how to set those up in terms of QED. It seems like QED is inherently linear, while density matrices are second order.

Carl
 
Thank you Carl
What I am really looking for is a description of the fundamental mechanisms at play, and that shall be suitable for understanding from high school kids (at least the bright ones in the last year), making use of plain algebra only, and without the need for calculus.
I would already know how to introduce the quantum concepts of probability amplitudes, interference effects, and non-locality, in a relatively simple and discursive way, accessible to high schools kids.
However, when I try to write down simple algebraic expressions starting from (Feynman diagrams approach):
- the expression for the amplitude that particle_1 emits a virtual photon
- the expression for the amplitude that said photon travels to the distance of particle_2
- the expression for the amplitude that said photon is adsorbed by particle_2
then, I cannot find in any textbook how to get from there to a simple (although approximated to the single photon exchange ... and maybe not very rigorously ...)
F = dp/dt, which would be easily understandable to last year high school students if we could find simple algebraic expressions for:
dp = average momentum exchanged at each virtual photon exchange
1/dt = average number of virtual photon exchanged / unit of time

Luca
 
Luca,

You will find that in A. Zee's book "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell" he 'derives' the energy of two charges by page 30 using QFT methods. Unfortunately, he uses plenty of calculus and the path integral so it's hardly appropriate for high school. It boils down to the fact that the photon propagator (~1/k^2) is just the Fourier transform of the energy (~1/r) up to some factors. I don't think this helps you much considering you target audience, but if you're interested check out Zee's book or reply here and I can show the details. I don't know of any way to get the result with just algebra, I think it's just a little more complicated than that, but I will keep trying to find/cook up something.
 
Thanks, Monkey
following your advice I searched amazon for "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell", and read several positive reviews about it.
I have purchased it, and it shall get to me in a couple of weeks.
In unlikely case I will managed to squeeze some "horrible oversimplifications" out of it, I might dare post them here.
Luca
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K