Proving Mathematical Statements: a Real-Life Example

  • Context: Mathematica 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rob Hal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematical Proofs
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation and truth of two mathematical statements involving quantifiers and real numbers. Participants explore whether the statements are equivalent and how the order of quantifiers affects their truth values.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Robbie suggests that both statements (a and b) mean the same thing and can be shown to be false by setting x = 2, leading to a non-real y.
  • Another participant counters that for x = 2, y can be ±√5, which are real numbers, indicating that the statements may not be false as Robbie claims.
  • Robbie acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the nature of the numbers involved, questioning if there is a difference between the two statements.
  • A later reply illustrates the importance of quantifier order with a simpler example, showing that the truth of statements can change based on their structure.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the two statements are equivalent and whether they are both false. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of the statements.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a consensus on the implications of the quantifiers in the statements, and there is uncertainty about the definitions of the terms used.

Rob Hal
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

If I have these two statements given to me, and I have to determine whether they are true or not.

a) [tex]\forall x \epsilon R[/tex] [tex]\exists y \epsilon R[/tex] [tex](y^2 = x^2 + 1)[/tex]
b) [tex]\exists y \epsilon R[/tex] [tex]\forall x \epsilon R[/tex] [tex](y^2 = x^2 + 1)[/tex]

Now, to me, they both mean exactly the same thing, and both can be shown to be false by setting x = 2, then y is not a real number.

However, seeing that the question specifically asks to prove just those two statements, I'm wondering if perhaps I am interpreting them wrong and they actually mean two different things.

Thanks in advance for any advice,
Robbie
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rob Hal said:
Now, to me, they both mean exactly the same thing, and both can be shown to be false by setting x = 2, then y is not a real number.
If x = 2 then [itex]y^2 = 2^2 + 1 \Leftrightarrow y = \pm \sqrt 5[/itex]. Those are real numbers, no?
 
lol... yeah...
I was thinking I was looking for rationals only... whoops...

Still, is there any difference in the two statements themselves?
 
Try a simpler one to see how the order of the quantifiers makes a difference:

[tex]\forall x \in \mathbb{R} \ \exists y \in \mathbb{R} \ (x = y)[/tex]

This says that for every real x that I choose, I can find at least one real y that is equal to that x. This is obviously true, since x = x.

[tex]\exists y \in \mathbb{R} \ \forall x \in \mathbb{R} \ (x = y)[/tex]

This says that I can find at least one real y that is equal to every real x. Well, there's more than one real number, so this is false.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K