What's the Force on a Coiled Rope Pulled with Constant Speed?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a uniform rope being pulled vertically with a constant speed. Participants are exploring the forces acting on the rope and the relationship between force, momentum, and energy as the rope is lifted.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the force exerted on the rope as a function of the height above the table and the implications of changing mass on momentum. There are attempts to derive expressions for force and energy, leading to questions about the integration of force and the resulting kinetic energy.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the assumptions made about mass and momentum. Some have provided insights into the relationships between force, mass, and energy, while others are seeking clarification on specific terms and their derivations. There is no explicit consensus yet, but multiple interpretations and lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of a non-constant mass as the rope is pulled, and how this affects the calculations of force and energy. The problem is framed within the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the depth of exploration.

asdf60
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
A uniform rope of mass 'i' per unit length is coiled on a table, one end s pulled straight up with constant speed Vo.

a. find the force exerted on the end of the rope as a function of distance of the top of the rope above table (y).
b. compare the power delivered to the rope with the rate of change of the ropes total mechanical energy.

Part a seems to be pretty simple... F-mg = dp/dt, so F(y) = i*V^2+i*y*g.

Now the problem is when i integrate F(y) with respect with y, I should get the total energy of the rope system. But i don't. The total energy = .5mv^2 + mgh = .5(i*y)(v^2) + .5(i*y)(y*g), which clearly isn't the integral of F. So what's going on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure I follow what you did, but you basically have mass that is a function of time.
 
Right.
That's why I set m(t) = y(t)*density*g.
 
Pls explain where [itex]iV^2[/itex] came from in part a.

Here's my line of thinking.

[tex]F = \dot p = ma[/tex]

Since v is constant, that means a = 0, meaning the net force on the rope is zero. No?
 
Last edited:
iv^2 is the change in momentum. This is because the change in mass is I*v, and velocity is a constant V, so dp/dt = Iv^2.
 
Last edited:
Hehe simultaneous post.

In any case, no. The momentum is not constant. The mass of rope moving at velocity V is increasing. Which implies that F is not zero.
 
Wait a minute asdf you mean

[tex]\frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{dm}{dt}v[/tex]

where

[tex]\frac{dm}{dy} = \frac{M}{L}[/tex]

so

[tex]\frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{M}{L}v^2[/tex]
 
which is precisely what i posted by saying dp/dt = i*v^2, where i = M/L (if M = mass of entire rope, and L = length of entire rope), just as you have.
 
Let me just be a bit more clear. The question can be simplified.

Forget gravity, and just say the force is pulling on the string. Then as was proven above, F = dp/dt = M/L * v^2. This makes sense, we can integrate to show that the momentum at time t is the integral of the force up to t.

But now, if we consider the kinetic energy = .5 m v ^2, where m = y*M/L, it breaks down. The kinetic energy as a function of y should be the integral F dy from 0 to y, but this is clearly not the case, as the integral of F dy is M/L * v^2 * y, which is close to KE(y) = .5 y*M/L v^2, but the .5 term is missing.

Why is the .5 term missing? Am a making an incredibly stupid mistake, or is something really wrong?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
hotvette said:
Pls explain where [itex]iV^2[/itex] came from in part a.

Here's my line of thinking.

[tex]F = \dot p = ma[/tex]

Since v is constant, that means a = 0, meaning the net force on the rope is zero. No?

I see it now.

[tex]F = \dot p = ma[/tex] is only true when m is constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K