Hypothesis Testing for NCAA Champion Probability in Big East Conference

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around hypothesis testing for the probability of an NCAA champion emerging from the Big East Conference, specifically examining whether this probability is 20%. The scope includes statistical reasoning and hypothesis formulation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes testing the hypothesis that the probability of the NCAA champion being from the Big East is 20%, using a significance level of 0.05.
  • Another participant questions the meaning of "actual ratio" mentioned in the initial post.
  • A different participant suggests that the assumptions include a normal population or large sample and that the population deviation is known, and provides a framework for stating null and alternative hypotheses.
  • This participant outlines the null hypothesis (H0: mu is equal to 20%) and the alternative hypothesis (HA: mu is not equal to 20%), indicating that it is a two-tailed test.
  • There is a discussion about calculating the test statistic using a formula involving the sample mean, population deviation, and sample size.
  • Another participant adds clarification regarding the z score corresponding to the significance level, describing it as the boundary for reject and do not reject regions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and interpretation of the initial question, with no consensus reached on the specifics of the hypothesis testing process or the meaning of terms used.

Contextual Notes

There are assumptions regarding the normality of the population and the known population deviation that remain unverified. The discussion also lacks clarity on the sample size and the definition of "actual ratio."

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in statistical hypothesis testing, particularly in the context of sports analytics and probability assessment, may find this discussion relevant.

nautica
Using a .05 level of sign, test the hyp that the probability of the NCAA champion being from the big east is 20%

The actual ratio is 3/63

Where should I start?

thanks
nautica
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by 'actual ratio'?
 
I'm a bit confused by your question but if I'm understanding it right:

You have two assumptions here: First you have a normal population or large sample and second, the population deviation is known.

State your null and alternative hypothesis.

H0: mu is equal to 20%
HA: mu is not equal to 20%

Because you are dealing with the alternative hypothesis that is not equal to mu naught, you will have a two tailed test with the Reject H0 in the two tails and the Do Not Reject H0 in the middle of the curve.

Now, you compute the value of the test statistic:

z = (sample mean - mu naught)/[(population deviation)(sample size)(1/2)]

I assume you are using a significance level of 5% but since you are dealing with a two tailed test, divide that area by two (in this case, 0.05/2). Essentially, this is the area you will be looking for in the table of z scores in the appendix of any Statistics book.

I don't have a book with me at the moment but look up the z score that corresonds to your significance level. If the test statistic falls in the Do Not Reject H0, obviously, don't reject H0. Likewise, if it falls in the reject zone, reject H0.

Hope this helps.
 
A bit of an embellishment to my earlier post:

The z score corresponding to your significance level is the numerical "mark" of where the Do not reject/ reject regions are.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K