Integral of an Infinite Product: ideas?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of a function defined by an infinite product, specifically how to evaluate the integral of such a product without expanding it into an infinite sum. Participants explore the implications of working with unknown sequences of functions and the conditions under which integration can be performed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests finding closed forms for the infinite product before attempting integration.
  • Another participant notes that integrating an unknown function is generally not possible except in special cases, highlighting the complexity of the problem.
  • A participant expresses interest in finding a theorem that relates the integration of infinite products to conditions like uniform convergence, contrasting it with the known result for sums.
  • One participant questions the feasibility of the integration approach and asks for alternative methods.
  • A later reply proposes the idea of changing the infinite sum to an integral as a potential alternative approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on how to approach the integration of the infinite product, with multiple competing views and uncertainties remaining about the methods and conditions applicable.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the unknown nature of the function sequences involved and the challenges in establishing conditions for the interchange of integration and product operations.

benorin
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,442
Reaction score
191
Ok, so I want to integrate a general function defined by an infinite product, and let us assume that the product is nice (e.g., absolutely convergent, ect.).

So, without expanding into an infinite sum, how do I evaluate [tex]\int_{z=a}^{b}\left(\prod_{n=0}^{\infty}(1+f_{n}(z))\right) dz[/tex]

Let z be real or complex, according to your preference.

Thanx, I know you guys will me help out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you should work on finding closed forms for the product first.
 
Tide said:
I think you should work on finding closed forms for the product first.

The motivation for the prompt was to find a way to perform said integration when [tex]\{f_{n}(x)\}[/tex] is an unknown sequence of functions. Hence finding a closed form for the product is, well, rather difficult.
 
In that case it would seem that your question is akin to asking what is the general result of integrating an unknown function g(x). That's simply not possible except in very special cases where, e.g. you know the result of the integration and are trying to determine the function (e.g. inverse scattering problems, Volterra integral equation etc.)
 
I'm looking for a theorem

I'm looking for a theorem like unto [tex]\int_{z=a}^{b}\left(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}f_{n}(z)\right) dz=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\left(\int_{z=a}^{b}f_{n}(z)dz\right) \Leftrightarrow \sum_{n=0}^{N}f_{n}(z) \rightarrow F(z) \mbox{ uniformly as } N\rightarrow\infty[/tex].
Clearly, it is generally true that the intergral of a product is NOT the product of the integrals. But I had hoped for some condition, such as uniform convrgence, and something else, such as the interchange of the order of summation and integration, that would make the integration of infinite products nice.
 
I don't see how to do it. Anyone else?
 
Since you're going to infinity for the sum, could you change it to an integral?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K