The right way to learn high school math.

  • Context: Schools 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dragon513
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    High school School
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges and approaches to learning high school mathematics, particularly focusing on the memorization of formulas and identities, such as trigonometric identities. Participants express their experiences and opinions on whether understanding derivations is more beneficial than rote memorization.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity of memorizing formulas and suggests that understanding their derivations would be more beneficial.
  • Another participant argues that teachers may prefer students to memorize formulas to avoid confusion, despite the potential for deeper understanding through derivation.
  • Some participants share their own experiences of not memorizing many identities and relying on formula sheets or online resources during tests.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of understanding the behavior of trigonometric functions rather than just memorizing identities.
  • One contributor mentions that while memorization can be useful during tests, deriving formulas can be time-consuming.
  • Another participant reflects on the trend of lowering expectations in education, noting that derivations were once more common in high school math classes.
  • Some participants express a desire to both memorize and understand the derivations of formulas, indicating a balance between the two approaches.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a range of opinions on the best approach to learning mathematics, with no clear consensus on whether memorization or understanding derivations is superior. Some advocate for a combination of both, while others emphasize one approach over the other.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention varying educational experiences, such as differences in curriculum and teaching methods, which may influence their perspectives on learning mathematics.

Who May Find This Useful

High school students, educators, and anyone interested in the pedagogical approaches to teaching mathematics may find this discussion relevant.

dragon513
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm a grade 12 high school student in Canada. This semester I'm taking math, chemistry, and physics and I've been really enjoying these classes so far. However, one question I can't even dare to ask my teachers is that why we are expected to memorize all those formula/equations. (ex/ Trig. Identities, Centripetal acceleration.) My math class is on Trig. and today my teacher gave us a sheet of paper which was full of equations (A Summary of Basic Identities and Formulae) and told us to memorize half of the stuff. So at home I started doing the h/w. I wrote down the identities repeatedly on a sheet of paper. However, I wanted to know how/why those identities work. So I went on Google and did a quick search. This http://oakroadsystems.com/twt/pythag.htm#squaredTop" came up and 5 minute of reading it saved me from 30 minute + of repetitive memorization. So I was wondering why the teachers wouldn't show us how those stuff(ie trig. identities) were derived at the first place. Surely deriving trig. identities weren't hard at all. Maybe they are just too lazy -_-??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is that half of the students would probably be confused, so your teacher, and other teachers, just think it easier to ask their students to just memorize some formulas. If you can derive the formulas yourself, great, I would continue to do that as you have a better understanding of how things work.
 
Students would be confused by division? Dear God...
 
Just do what I did: Never learn trig by playing games on your calculator the whole year and jump into Calculus.

I am taking multivariable calc and I STILL don't know 75% of those trig identities. I only know the most basic ones. If I ever see some nasty trig, I'll just whip out my nifty formula sheet I got with my book, or google it. Bam, problem solved.

The real problem is that nobody ever tells you what trig is until you get to calc. You get the formula sheet like in your class, ask "what the hell does this mean?", but don't find out until much later that it's ALL about triangles.

PL
 
I didn't take a proper precalc class in high school thus I never memorized any trig identities (well I know basic ones but not half or double angle). You need to know basic trig identities in calculus, but your professor should tell you. Otherwise in electrical engineering classes, we usually convert to complex exponential to avoid messy algebra with sine/cosine.

edit: I guess I'm not being very specific. Rather than telling you which formula to memorize, I think it's better for you to understand how sin/cos/tan (and their inverses) behave and look like and maybe sinh and cosh. I've never been stumped by a problem because of trig identity.
 
Last edited:
My philosophy is not to bother specifically memorizing formulas like trig identities. Instead, I tell my students to be aware of what kinds of identities exist, and look up the exact formulas in a table or crib sheet when necessary.
For example, I don't try keep straight in my memory all the formulas for sine and cosine of a sum or difference of angle. But I do know what they look like in general, so if I see something like [itex]sin \alpha cos \beta + sin \beta cos \alpha[/itex], I can say "aha, that looks like one of those identities," and look up which one I want.
You'll use certain identities more often than others, and memorize them naturally. For example, in physics you use [itex]\sin^2 \theta + \cos^2 \theta = 1[/itex] so often, that pretty quickly you won't need to look it up any more.

On the physics side, I think it's important to memorize formulas that are definitions of some quantity, for example kinetic energy, momentum, work, etc.; but not "derived" equations like the range of a projectile.
 
Last edited:
During the test, memorisation is better than you derive it during the test.
I never memorised a single formula and i derive it during the test (well, i know the basic formula to start with) it took way to long to do it.
 
Expectations of students are going down all the time. I remember going through derivations of many trig identities in high school (also Canada). Unfortunately the voices demanding kids do well in school are sometimes louder than the voices demanding the kids learn something, so material is often dumbed down.

Kudos to dragon for seeking out futhur explanation of the material rather than rote memorization. It will do you well in the long run. Keep it up!
 
DeadWolfe said:
Students would be confused by division? Dear God...
It's true... This exact scenario occurred a few days ago in my Precalculus class

It's sad really...
 
  • #10
Thank you all for your great responses.
You helped me setting my study direction :biggrin:
 
  • #11
i think u need them learn them (memorized them in a sense -but from useing them) , because u'll need to use them but for a deeper understanding u need to be able to derive them and even understand where they came from (not all of them).
 
  • #12
I remember learning about the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra in Precalculus, and, much to my frustration, they did not provide the proof for it because it was above the precalculus level. I would imagine that this situation is quite common in high school math, and sometimes you might have to live with it.

Personally, I like to both understand the derivations and memorize the formulas. Why, mathematic concepts are only interesting to me if I understand why and how they work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K