How Do Length Errors Propagate Through Different Operations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pixter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Length
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies how length errors propagate through various mathematical operations. For addition and subtraction, the absolute errors are summed. In contrast, for multiplication and division, the percentage errors are added. When dealing with powers, the percentage error is multiplied by the exponent. The example provided illustrates that for values x = 2 ± 0.01 and y = 3 ± 0.02, the combined error for x + y is ± 0.03, while for xy, it is ± 0.07.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division)
  • Familiarity with the concepts of absolute and percentage errors
  • Knowledge of mathematical powers and their properties
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate numerical ranges
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the propagation of errors in advanced mathematical operations
  • Learn about statistical methods for error analysis
  • Explore the concept of relative error in greater depth
  • Investigate practical applications of error propagation in scientific measurements
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics and engineering, researchers conducting experiments, and anyone involved in quantitative analysis requiring precision in measurements and calculations.

Pixter
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Right having a few labs at the moment and just wanted to get a clarificating conserning errors.

if i have a length error which is 2+-1... if i add two length or subtract two length, what do i do with the error?
the same if i multiply them och divide them...

and then finally if i sqaure,kube or take the sqrt of them..?

it's not that important could probably ask a tutor but have not lectures today so don't have to get the bus to the uni then =).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
for addition and subtraction add the absolute errors.
For division and multiplication add the percentage errors.
for cubes and squares etc. multiply the percentage error by the power.
 
Hypercase gave very good "rules of thumb". They are not exactly right but very, very accurate for small errors (surely you can do better than "2+-1"!) and far easier than being precise.

If you really want to be precise (of course, your "errors" won't be very precise anyway!) you could do this:
Suppose x is measured at 2+- 0.01, y is measured at 3+- 0.02.
That means that the true value of x is somewhere between 2-0.01= 1.99 and 2+0.01= 2.01. The true value of y is somewhere between 3- 0.02= 2.98 and 3+0.02= 3.02. The largest possible value for x+ y is 2.01+ 3.02= 5.03.
The smallest possible value of x+y is 1.99+ 2.98= 4.97. x+y is somewhere between 4.97 and 5.03: 5+- 0.03. Exactly what Hypercase said: the errors added.
Notice, by the way, that if you subtract the errors do not subtract! They still add. The largest x- y could possibly be is 2.01- 2.98= -0.97, the smallest is 1.99- 3.02= -1.03: x-y is -1+- 0.03- the error is still the sum of the errors.

Now what about xy? The largest xy could be is 2.01*3.02= 6.0702= 6+ 0.0702. The smallest is 1.99*2.98= 5.9302= 6-0.0698. A bit more complicated! To use Hypercases's suggestion, find the percentage error (also called "relative error") in x: 0.01/2 and in y: 0.02/3.
Adding those, the percntage error in xy is 0.03/6+ 0.04/6= 0.07/6 and the absolute error is 6(0.07/6)= 0.07: xy is 6+- 0.07 which, while not exact, is pretty darn accurate.
As Hypercase said, since powers are "repeated multiplication" you do a "repeated addition", i.e. multiplication, of the percentage error.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K