Rotational motion of a spool of wire

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the rotational motion of a spool of wire, specifically focusing on the dynamics involved when a force is applied to the wire and the subsequent effects on angular velocity and linear motion of a mass attached to the spool. The problem includes aspects of conservation of energy and torque calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of conservation of energy and torque in relation to the spool's motion and the mass's descent. There are questions regarding the role of gravitational force and whether other forces, such as normal force, are relevant in this context.

Discussion Status

Several participants are actively engaging with the problem, attempting various calculations and questioning the appropriateness of their methods and assumptions. There is a recognition of the complexity due to multiple variables, and some guidance has been offered regarding the use of torque and angular acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion over the correct application of given variables and the appropriate radius to use in calculations. There is an acknowledgment that the initial conditions differ between the two parts of the problem, which may affect the approach taken.

Punchlinegirl
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
A spool of thin wire rotates without friction about its axis. A man pulls down on a wire connected to an inner radius with force of 16.3 N. How long does it take to increase the angular velocity of the spool from 15.0 rad/s to 33.0 rad/s? Icm = 0.550 kgm2 Inner radius, r = 0.300 m Outer radius, R = 0.560 m.
I got this part, the answer was 2.02 s.
For the second part, it says, Consider the same spool as in the previous problem. Now, instead of pulling on the wire, the man attaches the wire to a mass of 0.900 kg. The man let's go of the mass, and the spool starts to turn. What is the speed of the mass after it has traveled downward a distance of 0.650 m? (Assume there is no energy lost to friction.)
Here's what I did
Conservation of energy: [tex](1/2)Iw_f^2 - (1/2)Iw_i^2 = W[/tex]
(1/2)(.550)(33.0)^2 - (1/2)(.550)(15)^2= 237.6 J
[tex]W= \tau (\Theta_f - \Theta_i)[/tex]
[tex]237.6 = \tau (.650)[/tex]
[tex]\tau=109.5[/tex]
[tex]\tau= I \alpha[/tex]
[tex]\alpha= 199.1[/tex]
I don't think I'm doing this the right way.. can someone please help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The mass is being pulled down by gravity but is being 'pulled up' by the rope. Gravity has to pull down the mass as well as turn the spool of string.
 
So how would I get that to come into play?
 
Gravity pulls the mass down with force F. The force F is then transferred to the spool of string and it experiences a _____ because it is being pulled off center.
 
torque??

so I would use [tex]/tau = r x F[/tex] where F=mg, this would be the pull from gravity..
Isn't there a normal force acting on it too?
 
Where is this normal force coming from? The spool isn't on the ground.
 
Ok so I found the torque to be 2.67 Nm.
Was my inital idea of using conservation of energy to solve it correct?
Having so many "given" variables confuses me on where to go from here.
 
Well now you've got your ball's torque and its moment of inertia. Find the angular acceleration, then find the linear acceleration at the edge. Then find out how fast the mass is dropping once the string has stretched 0.65m
 
Ok so
[tex]/tau= I /alpha[/tex]
so [tex]2.67 = .550 * /alpha[/tex] = 4.85 rad/s^2
[tex]/alpha= ar[/tex]
a= 4.85(.300)
a= 1.46
x= v_init * t + (1/2)at^2
.65= 2.02v + (1/2)(1.46)(2.02)^2
solving for v gave me -1.15 m/s...
which wasn't right...
Am i using the right radius?
 
  • #10
Where did you get your value for t?
You were fine up to a = 1.46m/s^2

From there try [itex]v_f^2 = v_i^2 + 2ad [/tex] <br /> <br /> I get v = 1.9m/s towards the ground.[/itex]
 
  • #11
I was using the t that I got from the first part of the problem. I don't think that is the right time to use in this part though, since the man was pulling on it before and now a mass is.
I tried using the equation you used, and the answer was still wrong..
Should I try energy conservation?
 
  • #12
I really don't know how to do this problem and if I am even using the right radius. Can someone please help? Thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K