Residue at a pole of non-integer order

  • Thread starter Thread starter emob2p
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pole Residue
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the residue at a pole of non-integer order, specifically for the function \(\frac {e^{ipx}}{(p - i \kappa)^\eta}\) at \(p = i \kappa\), where \(\eta\) is a positive non-integer. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the residue's value and suspects it may be zero, seeking proof for this assertion.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of poles and residues in the context of non-meromorphic functions, questioning how these concepts apply to the original poster's function with a non-integer power.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding meromorphic functions and the implications of non-integer powers, noting that such functions may not be analytic and involve branch cuts. The discussion is ongoing, with no consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the challenges posed by the non-integer power in the function, which complicates the analysis due to the necessity of defining branch cuts. This aspect is under consideration as participants navigate the problem.

emob2p
Messages
56
Reaction score
1
Hi,
Does anyone know a straightforward way to calculate a residue at at a pole of non-integer order. I'm trying to find the residue of [tex]\frac {e^{ipx}}{(p - i \kappa)^\eta}[/tex] at [tex]p = i \kappa[/tex] where [tex]\eta[/tex] is a positive non-integer. Thanks.

I have reason to suspect it's zero, but I'd need to see the proof.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How are you defining poles and residues for non-meromorphic functions?
 
I'm not sure what non-meromorphic functions are.
 
A meromorphic function is simply a function that is almost analytic in its domain. In detail, it is analytic except at a discrete set of points, and at these points it cannot have an essential singularity. Meromorphic functions are what you usually meet in the theory of residues partly because these functions are "nice" almost everywhere so many of the theorems concerning analytic functions apply. The trouble with your function is that it isn't analytic because it has a non integer power. Non integer powers are defined using the logarithm and therefore necessarily have multiple branches and require a branch cut. In this case, the cut has to start at [tex]p = i \kappa[/tex] so you have to integrate through the branch cut no matter how you define it.
 
Last edited:
Monkey, you're everywhere. Thanks again, it makes good sense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K