A well thought out nuke could not be stopped by emp. Neutrons run it which are not electfically charged. secondly the best way is to shoot something at to deflect it F=ma, so that it mises and blows up in the atmosphere. THis is very easily done makes nukes almost not worth it.
mass doesn't increase, the correct phenomena is impedance aka relative mass. Just puting it out there since many people get confused with mass (the amount of matter in an object) and impedance (inertia; relative mass) which are both used interchengably as mass.
Phinds this will answer ur question. you don't get many worlds because is full of bs, but according tot hem every event like me typing this is a superposition of infinite worlds and when i make a dicisoin they split, so no energy is created is just that the paths separate. As you can see it is...
LOL many worlds hypothesis is most nonesense. It's ridiculous this view is promoted; over say the de Broglie -eineseint view (which although i do not think is correct) at least makes sense
Thank you, yes what I was looking four.
of course blcack body depends on temperature however my question was if there whas a limit to it. Ineterestingly enough I found the answer to my question thanks
Don't worry kids your queries will be answered soon as I have submited my paper regarding radiation to Arxv: mass of the photon etc...(close to what predicted by debroglie). In response to the OP, no there is no evidence, we have never seen an electron and as feynman we say we can only infer as...
what is the shortest and longest wavelenght that has experimentally observed for a black body?
Additoinally what are the theoretical limits?
I know it's a hard one,
You know schrodinger was on einsteins side and said that the cat died or lived and that it did not matter what the observer saw. It was the bohr crew that believed in wave collapse. so in the cats point of view acording to einsteint and schrodinger he dies if the bobm explodes or lives if it...
In your opinion who is your favorite scientist that studied heat/temperature and why?
Secondly, what scientist do you think did the most work and had the most queries in regards to temperature/heat thermodynamics in general.
Good question. BUy yourself a cow. it keeps grass low. DO you need your grass more cut? buy more cows. Are they cutting the grass to well? turn a cow into beef. Eventually after experiment you shall reach homeostasis; your lawn wil be the height you like it and you get some cows for milk and...
No of course your hypothetical question is extremely wrong in real physics; however because the mass continuasly increases (which would never happen) the velocity of each particle decreaes (conservation of energy and momentm) so after much time has passed (and all masses have incredibly...
LOL. Not to cheat but we have a mini LHC at where I work. And it was VERY VERY (in the billions of course) expensive = automatic win. lol
hehe so i won't post a pic.
I am interesting in what other ppl are picturing. Nice funny contest. Rep +
I cannot believe people are giving you so much greif for this Crazy Horse. As what you found (while not a new rule) is a simple beautiful association.
The mathematical law is of course priceless (although already discovred) but great credit to you for rediscovering.
Here I shall explain. If...