Stop an Incoming Nuke: EMP Effect, Other Options

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yoyopizza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuke
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of stopping an incoming nuclear missile using an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) and explores alternative methods for interception. Participants examine the mechanisms of nuclear detonators and the potential effects of EMPs on such devices, as well as the physics of deflecting a missile.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Exploratory, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that an EMP could potentially disable a nuclear missile, while others argue that the mechanism of nuclear detonation relies on neutrons, which are not electrically charged, suggesting that an EMP would have no effect.
  • One participant suggests that contemporary nuclear warheads may have electrical components in their detonators, which could be susceptible to an EMP, raising questions about the design and functionality of such devices.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes the possibility of physically deflecting the missile using a force-based approach, referencing Newton's second law (F=ma) to argue that this could prevent detonation by causing the missile to miss its target.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the effectiveness of EMPs against nuclear missiles, with no consensus reached on whether an EMP could disable a missile or if alternative methods are more viable. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of nuclear weapon design and the implications of EMP effects.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the speculative nature of discussions surrounding nuclear weapon design, which may limit the conclusions that can be drawn from the conversation.

yoyopizza
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
Could you stop an incoming nuke with an emp? Would it disable the nuke, or just detonate? Or even have no effect, what would happen? Is there any other way you might stop an incoming nuke?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A well thought out nuke could not be stopped by emp. Neutrons run it which are not electfically charged. secondly the best way is to shoot something at to deflect it F=ma, so that it mises and blows up in the atmosphere. THis is very easily done makes nukes almost not worth it.
 
AkInfinity said:
A well thought out nuke could not be stopped by emp. Neutrons run it which are not electfically charged.

While true that neutrons are what cause the reaction, one needs a mechanism of bringing the nuclear matter to criticality at the appropriate time (i.e. when to blow up the bomb). I'm not sure how contemporary nuclear warheads are designed, but the detonators seem to have an electrical component to them and hence at least have the potential to be disarmed (or prematurely activated) by a large electromagnetic disturbance.
 
Thread closed for review for obvious reasons...EDIT -- thread will remain closed, and will be deleted in a couple of days. Speculation about nuclear weapon design is just that, speculation, which is against the PF rules.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K