For problem: See Attachment
I've never done a problem of this sort and it's proving to be much more difficult compared to the other problems I have had assigned to me.
I'm not entirely sure which formulas to use but I've been playing with the following:
Length of Arc = r\theta
A = \pir^2
C =...
So would I have two separate solutions? i.e: One for when the denominator is positive and the other for when it is negative, and then simplify from there?
Or is it something else?
Thanks! I have the absolute value in the denominator so far, I guess it serves as a general answer.
If what...
Not sure, but I have two guesses:
a). What catches my eye first are the (secx + tanx)^2 in the numerator and denominator. But, I don't know anyway to simplify the expression further.
b). A possible trigonometric identity I don't see?
Haha, give me a hint! :P
Yes I have that answer exactly! (I simplified by factoring out the secx to get (secx)((secx + tanx)^2) in the numerator)
Sorry, I realized my input into WolframAlpha was incorrect. Thanks for your help!
I see my error! The numerator is now correct.
But I have two of these ((sec(x)+tan(x))2)1/2=|sec(x)+tan(x)| expressions in the denominator, and the answer has only one.
How would I go about handling this?
Problem:
y = ln|sec(x) + tan(x)|
Attempted Solution: See Attachment
I was hoping someone could identify my error and possibly write it out for me. At first I thought my steps were correct and everything was in order. However, when I checked my answer on WolframAlpha it gave me a slightly...
Two things:
1). I'm an idiot.
2). I love you guys, thank you. Did I mention I'm an idiot?
Note to self: Move your *** from your desk from time to time and get a breather...or you forget to factor :bugeye:
Thanks again, & good night friends! :zzz:
Oh ok.
Here are my attempts at the solution (see attachments). The attachments are two separate work-in-progress solutions with slightly varying steps. If someone could please help me out that'd be great. This assignment is due tomorrow morning at 8 for me (it's almost midnight right now)...
Thank you for the replies. I double checked, and this is the expression I was given.
Checking this expression on wolframalpha you get the answer of 1/2.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=lim+%28x--%3E1%29+%283%2F%281-x%5E%281%2F2%29%29+-+2%2F%281-x%5E%281%2F3%29%29%29
If however, the...
Thanks Ray, but I unfortunately do not know how to expand. If there is another method, please suggest so!
LCKurtz, think you could help? Sorta stealing my thread here aha
I'm sorry, I don't think I quite understand Ray Vickson.
If anyone is willing to explain their method a little more in-depth it would be greatly appreciated!