chwala's latest activity
-
chwala reacted to Mark44's post in the thread Find the smallest value of angle ##α + β ## with
Like.
The wording of the problem isn't clear, IMO. The smallest positive value for ##\alpha + \beta## is ##\frac \pi 4##. There are smaller... -
chwala reacted to DrClaude's post in the thread How to apply BODMAS correctly in the given problem with
Like.
I'm getting tired of being these in my social media. This is mathematically ambiguous and there is no right answer. -
chwala reacted to neilparker62's post in the thread Prove that ## 4\tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{5}\right]- \tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{239}\right]= \dfrac{π}{4}## with
Like.
Neat geometric derivation of ##\tan(A+B)=\frac{\tan A + \tan B}{1-\tan A \tan B}## if we divide all terms in ##\frac{ay+bx}{by-ax}## by... -
chwala replied to the thread Prove that ## 4\tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{5}\right]- \tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{239}\right]= \dfrac{π}{4}##.a different line for ##\tan 4S## ##\tan (4S)= \tan (2S +2S) = \dfrac{\tan 2S + \tan 2S}{1 - \tan^2 (2S)}## ##\tan (2S) =... -
chwala reacted to Steve4Physics's post in the thread Prove that ## 4\tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{5}\right]- \tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{239}\right]= \dfrac{π}{4}## with
Like.
For an essentially geometric proof (no standard trig' identities used) see this 3 minute (appox.) video. -
chwala reacted to neilparker62's post in the thread Prove that ## 4\tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{5}\right]- \tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{239}\right]= \dfrac{π}{4}## with
Like.
$$\tan x=\frac{1}{5} \implies \tan2x=\frac{5}{12} \implies \tan4x=\frac{120}{119}$$ $$\tan \left( \tan^{-1} \left( \frac{1}{239}... -
chwala reacted to Gavran's post in the thread Prove that ## 4\tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{5}\right]- \tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{239}\right]= \dfrac{π}{4}## with
Informative.
There are four formulas of this kind. Euler's formula $$ \arctan\frac12+\arctan\frac13=\frac\pi4 $$ Hermann's formula $$... -
chwala replied to the thread Prove that ## 4\tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{5}\right]- \tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{239}\right]= \dfrac{π}{4}##.I note that in my proof, i did not have the ##4S## and instead worked with ##S## ... that was wrong. Your working clearly shows that... -
chwala commented on neilparker62's profile post.Thanks @neilparker62 -
chwala commented on neilparker62's profile post.@neilparker62 , mate, let me just go with what is there, i fully understand it if there is no official letterhead. Any letter will do...