Recent content by Fuzzystuff
-
F
Graduate Wheeler's Delayed Choice Experiment
Werunom, Thanks for the response. I agree with you too that this is the case, but I would like it to come from someone who has a degree in quantum physics or has at least a lot of expertise to verify the claims being made on what Wheeler meant by "act of observation"- Fuzzystuff
- Post #4
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
F
Graduate Wheeler's Delayed Choice Experiment
Bumping this. I would like to know what Wheeler is implying about the act of observation. I am pretty sure he means with detectors or instruments, and not that of a sentient being's knowledge of the particle. Is this correct? Someone who knows what they're talking about please respond. :)- Fuzzystuff
- Post #2
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
F
Graduate Wheeler's Delayed Choice Experiment
Wheeler's delayed choice experiment is a thought experiment proposed by John Archibald Wheeler in 1978. Wheeler proposed a variation of the famous double-slit experiment of quantum physics, one in which the method of detection can be changed after the photon passes the double slit, so as to...- Fuzzystuff
- Thread
- Choice Delayed choice Experiment
- Replies: 3
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
F
Graduate Is Thomas Campbell's Interpretation of the Double Slit Experiment Valid?
I just want to say also that soprano over at mbt is not the tofu guy here. Also, Ross Rhodes does not have a lot of credential when discussing quantum physics correctly, does he? This site here http://www.bottomlayer.com/bottom/reality/chap2.html talks about the experiment that Thomas mentions...- Fuzzystuff
- Post #12
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
F
Graduate Is Thomas Campbell's Interpretation of the Double Slit Experiment Valid?
Name is BrandonHedberg there- Fuzzystuff
- Post #11
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
F
Graduate Is Thomas Campbell's Interpretation of the Double Slit Experiment Valid?
It's in the Physics section, titled, "Putting Things Straight, Consciousness and QM Issue." Here: http://www.my-big-toe.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=5669- Fuzzystuff
- Post #9
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
F
Graduate Is Thomas Campbell's Interpretation of the Double Slit Experiment Valid?
Does the wave function of the particle collapse or get interfered with upon interactions with other particles? In all cases?- Fuzzystuff
- Post #4
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
F
Graduate Is Thomas Campbell's Interpretation of the Double Slit Experiment Valid?
So I've been in a debate at this other forum on http://www.my-big-toe.com/ My Big TOE book written by "physicist" Thomas W. Campbell For some days now, I've been telling them that there is absolutely no evidence for the experiment that is claimed in at 2:45 to 4:00. He (Thomas) says in...- Fuzzystuff
- Thread
- Replies: 13
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
F
Graduate Revisiting the Completeness of Quantum Theory: A Scientist's Perspective
I accept that it is incomplete. I don't think science could provide a complete theory. That is my personal belief.- Fuzzystuff
- Post #84
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
F
Why Are You Conscious in Your Own Body?
I think everyone is part of each other in a coherent system of communication and perception. It is the area of matter known as your body where your signaling and collective mechanisms exist. You communicate and interact, just as I communicate and interact. So not to say you could be someone...- Fuzzystuff
- Post #10
- Forum: General Discussion
-
F
Surgeries in Full Moon and New Moon
Yeah, that's me. So watch out! We call very weird or strange people 'Loonies'. The word Loony was derived out of Luna, the name of our moon. Just an interesting idea. Do you suppose that if the effects are not negligible, they are at least minimal? In other words, is there any possibility...- Fuzzystuff
- Post #12
- Forum: Biology and Medical
-
F
High School Types of Forces: Push, Pull, Weight, Friction & More
If gravity can be repulsive, it's yet to be discovered. I have a belief that it could be repulsive. It's mesmerizing what could happen if gravity would be repulsive, or if mass had negative values, etc.- Fuzzystuff
- Post #7
- Forum: Mechanics
-
F
Graduate What Drives Time Forward in Our Universe?
Space-time can be thought of, in Einstein's eyes, as a gigantic frozen block of ice. All movement, ever, is inside this block of ice. Does the block of ice exist? Is it completely deterministic? And you're right. If there is no information being exchanged or "moving", then there is no...- Fuzzystuff
- Post #13
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
F
Graduate What Drives Time Forward in Our Universe?
Einstein was a genius, but he never said time was an illusion, at least not in the idea you're meaning. Time is real, it's just as real as space. You cannot even describe motion without using both space *and* time. Einstein even made up a new word, space-time, a combination of the 3...- Fuzzystuff
- Post #9
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
F
Graduate What Drives Time Forward in Our Universe?
Pretty sure Entropy can be thought of as the forward motion of time. Try putting all of the carbon molecules back into the can of pop you just opened. Good luck with that. Also, another idea is try to put an egg back together after it has been shattered on the floor. Not only would you have...- Fuzzystuff
- Post #5
- Forum: Special and General Relativity