Recent content by gop
-
G
Undergrad Notation of thermodynamics & heat
So as an mathematical analogy one could say that dU is an exact differential form while delta Q and delta W are not exact (differential forms).- gop
- Post #7
- Forum: Thermodynamics
-
G
Undergrad Notation of thermodynamics & heat
Hi, I have two questions regarding the laws of thermodynamics 1) For example in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_law_of_thermodynamics the first law of thermodynamics is defined using two different symbols d (as in infinitestimal change) und the symbol delta (which in the article also...- gop
- Thread
- Heat Notation Thermodynamics
- Replies: 7
- Forum: Thermodynamics
-
G
Determine if sqrt(-3) is an element in a splitting field
Homework Statement L is the splitting field generated by x^2+x+1 (over \mathbb{Q}) a) Is \sqrt{-3} an element of L? b) Is sqrt(-3) an element of \mathbb{Q}(a), where a is a complex root of x^3+x+1? Homework Equations The Attempt at a Solution Really no idea.- gop
- Thread
- Element Field Splitting
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
-
G
Graduate Perturbation theory question (in Quarks & Leptons)
Well , the derivation of T_fi (on pages 79-82) uses the fact that the Schroedinger equation is first order in time. If a second order equation is substituted, a differential equation for the coefficients (a_f) results that is quite different from the simple differential equation that results...- gop
- Post #3
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
G
Graduate Perturbation theory question (in Quarks & Leptons)
Hi I'm referring to the book Quarks and Leptons (Halzen, Martin). On pages 79-82 nonrelativistic perturbation theory is investigated (i.e. by using the Schroedinger equation, which is first order in time). On Page 85, however, the transition amplitude (T_fi) is used that has been derived on...- gop
- Thread
- Perturbation Perturbation theory Quarks Theory
- Replies: 3
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
G
Graduate Infinite cross section in scattering
@Bob I'm not really sure I'm following your first point. As the cross section increases shouldn't the number of scattered particle increase (everything else being equal). @Vanadium That sounds plausible I guess. I'm still not sure however why this isn't pointed out in the book. Maybe I...- gop
- Post #4
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
G
Graduate Infinite cross section in scattering
Hi For example in e-e- -> e-e- scattering (electron-electron scattering) the differential cross section goes to infinity as theta goes to zero. Consequently the cross section is infinite. But how can we measure and interpret the cross section/differential cross section and interpret it as a...- gop
- Thread
- Cross Cross section Infinite Scattering Section
- Replies: 8
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
G
Graduate Particle physics & QFT, A conceptual question
A final question. In what order does one approach these subjects up to know I thought first particle physics and then quantum field theory is the way to go. However, I'm not so sure anymore especially since (from looking at e.g. the TOC of Peskin, Schroeder "An Introduction To Quantum Field...- gop
- Post #7
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
G
Graduate Particle physics & QFT, A conceptual question
Hi Thank you both for your answer. Maybe you can help me to clarify an additional point. How does the standard model fits into this? The standard model is covered in most particle physics books. So if it is a pretty complete description of nature (except gravity and neutrino mass of...- gop
- Post #4
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
G
Graduate Particle physics & QFT, A conceptual question
Hi In Halzen's "Quarks & Leptons" all discussed particle interactions conserve particle number in some sense (Actually particle number is not conserved but if you count the particles minus the antiparticles before the reaction you get the same "particles minus the antiparticles" number after...- gop
- Thread
- Conceptual Particle Particle physics Physics Qft
- Replies: 8
- Forum: High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
-
G
Norm Inequality: Proving Max Statement
Thanks for your answer. Now I'm slightly confused. Actually the example is taken from "Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems". where it is stated that For any vectors f,g\in\mathbb{R}^n \chi(f+g) \leq \max\{\chi(f),\chi(g)\} where \chi is the Lyapunov exponent given...- gop
- Post #3
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
G
Norm Inequality: Proving Max Statement
Homework Statement Show that \frac{\Vert X(u+v) \Vert}{\Vert u+v \Vert} \leq \max \{ \frac{\Vert Xu \Vert}{\Vert u \Vert}, \frac{\Vert Xv \Vert}{\Vert v \Vert} \} Homework Equations The Attempt at a Solution Tried to rewrite the max statement as an inequality...- gop
- Thread
- Norm
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
G
Graduate Limit of compression (source coding theorem)
ok I got it if I use conditional probabilities I need to use another model and another way to compute the entropy rate. thx- gop
- Post #5
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
G
Graduate Limit of compression (source coding theorem)
But if I have something like this p(x,y,z)= (1/3,1/3,1/3) then I have entropy 1.585. But now I could have p(y|x) = 1/2 or p(y|x) = 1 as long as p(y|z)=1-p(y|x) the overall probability p(x,y,z) stays the same. So I have the same entropy. But in the case of p(y|x)=1 I can only use two...- gop
- Post #3
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
G
Graduate Limit of compression (source coding theorem)
Hi The source coding theorem says that one needs at least N*H bits to encode a message of length N and entropy H. This supposedly is the theoretical limit of data compression. But is it? Or does it only apply to situations where only the frequency (probability) of a given symbol is known...- gop
- Thread
- Coding Compression Limit Theorem
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics