Recent content by Mario Rossi

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reduction

I found a theory made by Penrose and Hameroff, it's called ORCH-OR, what do you think about it?

Yes, this is the main answer. If we try to make an hypothesis on the "came first the observer", what can we think? The universe is prior to the observers, right? If not, so the Big Bang theory is wrong and we must search not the beginning of the universe but the beginning of the observer.

And so, does God confusing us throwing dices (indeterminism)? Does an electron exists when nobody looks at it? If no, why the wave function collapses (maybe this is too difficult for me like you said, if it is, skip it)?

@bhobba @PeterDonis @Lord Jestocost @phinds what do you think about this: https://phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-universe.html ?

There is not a way to know the "territory", every knowledge is a map including electrons. Maybe it is an accurate map, maybe it is not.

Are you referring to the Korzybski's "the map is not the territory"? You need to consider that both two the interpretations (thoughts) and the experiences are maps. Remember the human body is limited and need technology (map) to perceive the world (for example in QM). But the important thing is...

Guys what do you think about this: https://phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-universe.html ? Should I open another thread?

All right Bill, thank you. Aren't there ways to prove the ontological side? I suppose not yet. And what do you think about that story on von Neumann's discovery (the hidden variable is the cosciusness ecc.)? Thank you all for the help. EDIT: Another question: what do you guys think about the...

So the observer effect does not make a quantum system 100% deterministic, right?

Thank you all guys. Do you think the youtube channel like The Royal Institution (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYeF244yNGuFefuFKqxIAXw) are reliable to understand something? Or Ted talks? I'm asking this because sometime I can look videos but it is difficult for me to read a book.

Ok guys thank you all. @PeterDonis you are right :) I just searched pop knowledge and there is no shortcut. All right, I understand the situation, just a little curiosity before quit this topic: the QM interpretations are just interpretetions? Is the QM fully understood and verified or not...

Ok sorry guys for the jumble. Ok I want to ask just one question to you: the casuality and its relation to the measure paradox: I read that when a quantum system is not observed it is casual and when it is observed it is deterministic. The 1st quote Hawking So Einstein was wrong when he said...

Hi, I'm trying to understand the QM, I have no background and I can only do some research sometime because I've no time for this. Yesterday I read the quote above. He's talking about black holes and the horizon of events. I read that the microcosm can make indeterminate the macrocosm, for...

If you put the system in the starting situation every time the forces are present and re-attracts/repells the moleculs in the same way, creating a loop, isn'it right? But the source of energy should finish, or no?