B What's the energy source for the Van der Waals' forces?

Mario Rossi
Messages
31
Reaction score
5
Hi, I know that if you put a dipole and a neutral molecule at a certain distance, there is the Debye's force that attract them. If you put the same molecules in the first position, they will attract another time.

I know this can be a stupid answers, but what's the font of that energy? The permanent charge of the paricles? If yes, is it the energy of the Big Bang?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

With font you mean source, right ?
And I would say the electrostatic field from the charges is the source. Dipoles interact. Charges interact. It's what they do for a living.

Searching for anything deeper gets you into endless threads with less relevant content :rolleyes: (there will be folks with a different opinion, though).
 
  • Like
Likes Mario Rossi
BvU said:
Hi,

With font you mean source, right ?
And I would say the electrostatic field from the charges is the source. Dipoles interact. Charges interact. It's what they do for a living.

Searching for anything deeper gets you into endless threads with less relevant content :rolleyes: (there will be folks with a different opinion, though).

Thank you very much! Yes I mean source, sorry for my bad english :D. Anyway, is that source the Big Bang energy? The charges are the elementary particles, with a permanent charge, so that charge is alimented by the Big Bang energy, is it correct?
 
BvU said:
Hi,

With font you mean source, right ?
And I would say the electrostatic field from the charges is the source. Dipoles interact. Charges interact. It's what they do for a living.

Searching for anything deeper gets you into endless threads with less relevant content :rolleyes: (there will be folks with a different opinion, though).

If you put the system in the starting situation every time the forces are present and re-attracts/repells the moleculs in the same way, creating a loop, isn'it right? But the source of energy should finish, or no?
 
Energy is conserved
 
  • Like
Likes Mario Rossi
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top