Actually, I have another related problem that's similar enough I thought I'd add it here rather than start a new thread - hope that's OK:
Homework Statement
A particle's movement along a curve is described in polar coordinates by ##r(t) = bt## and ##\varphi (t) = \frac{c}{t}## (##b## and...
Homework Statement
[/B]
A particle is moving along a curve described by ##p(t) = Re^{\omega t}## and ##\varphi (t) = \omega t##. What is the particles transverse acceleration? Homework Equations
[/B]
None
The Attempt at a Solution
[/B]
The position vector is ##Re^{\omega t} \vec{e_p}##...
Sorry for being dense, but doesn't this mean that we need to find out IF ##0 < a_n < 2##? Because ##0 < a_n < a_{n+1} < 2## seems to follow from ##0 < a_n < 2## (isn't that what implication means? IF ##A## THEN ##B##, meaning we want to check IF ##A## because if it is, then ##B##?), then don't...
Thank you for the response.
I am not sure I follow. Could you show what you mean here? I can't seem to find a way to show that ##0 < a_n < 2## without first showing that ##a_{n+1} < 2## (because the ##a_n## term is "hidden" under the square root term that describes ##a_{n+1}##.
Decided to ask a follow-up question here rather than start a new thread, hope that's OK.
I'm reading up about finding limits of recursive functions. For example, ##a_1=\sqrt{2}, a_{n+1} = \sqrt{2a_n}##.
As far as I understand, the procedure is as follows:
1) ##\lim_{n \to \infty} a_{n+1} =...
I understand that when a sequence is described recursively, for example: ##a_1=2, a_{n+1} = \sqrt{3a_n}## then we mean that the first term is 2, the second term is ##\sqrt{3*2} = \sqrt{6}##, the third term is ##\sqrt{3*\sqrt{6}}##, and so on.
What I do not understand is how to interpret the...
I decided to approach the problem from a non-inertial frame of reference as it seems easier (to me) for this problem:
For starters, I would like to see if I finally managed to get the normal force right.
Assuming the incline ##M## is accelerating to the right, the sliding object ##m## is...
I think I see the issue. I assumed that ##N- mgcos(\alpha)=0##. Now that the incline ##M## is moving, it is exerting a force ##ma## onto block ##m##, which has a component of ##masin(\alpha)## perpendicular to the incline surface. This makes ##N = mgcos(\alpha) + masin(\alpha)##.
Is this correct?