Recent content by mlsbbe

.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

AMENDED..on second thoughts... For the first one: Ignore the sizes because there is no repeating sequence observable..., and focus on the whether or not its filled and the shapes The pattern for the top and bottom row is like this: (1) Square, square, square, circle, circle.. (2) Big...

AMENDED..on second thoughts... For the first one: Ignore the sizes because there is no repeating sequence observable..., and focus on the whether or not its filled and the shapes The pattern for the top and bottom row is like this: (1) Square, square, square, circle, circle.. (2) Big, Big...

Yea, I got E for the first as well

wow ..thats an interesting way of looking at the problem

I can't see the pattern here?

I personally think its C too, so here's my logic: For the first and second pictures, the 4th and 1st quadrant remains the same, For the second and third pictures, the 1st and 4th quadrants remains the same, For the third and fourth pictures, the 4th and 3rd quadrants remains the same, For the...

why can't the second one be A? its also pointing downwards...

Hi Guys, Got these two IQ questions... Anybody know the answers to? Not too sure about the answers to both...

Hi Guys, Whats the next picture in the series?

hmm thanks really weird question.. seems like you need a lot of assumptions here...

stuck on everything... don't even know how to approach the questions! I don't think the questions make any sense at all... For the first question: 9.6*(10000/1000000)=0.096 will give the accidents for 10 000 miles. But will still need to solve for 1000 people. How to do that? I can...

Hi guys, Need some help solving the following problems below.. For some reason, I cannot solve these darn problems..They should be really easy... ...

Hi, I am having trouble understanding this proof. Statement If pn is the nth prime number, then pn \leq 22n-1 Proof: Let us proceed by induction on n, the asserted inequality being clearly true when n=1. As the hypothesis of the induction, we assume n>1 and the result holds for all...

I've made an attempt. I don't think I seem to be getting this right...can somebody check to see if I'm getting anything wrong? (-57)*(-2) + 44 =158 (44)*(-2) + 31 = -57 (31)*(1) + 13 = 44 (13)*(2) + 5 =31 (5)*(2) + 3 =13 (3)*(1) + 2 =5 (1)*(2) +1= 3 gcd(a,b) = 1 Apparently, the answer...