Recent content by newbie1127

Hey, Could you please tell me what that website is in the picture, I've been looking for good sources to understand calculus and in the picture everything about it seems to be laid out in a nice list.

I solved the problem using both mine and your method to see what the values would be but arrived at the same answer for all the legs. Although, your method was much shorter and easier. After solving it, I do understand why that is, I feel like I was too concerned about splitting the load into...

I've done this but I feel like I took a shortcut with that assumption maybe it wasn't meant to be solved like this?

I have tried solving this by splitting the load into two parallel coplaner loads as the Hint below the question suggests but while i was computing the values i realized that, i'll have 4 variables with only 3 equations. two forces and the two distances to forces from their respective axes. i've...

I have been self studying for sometime now, ever since Corona hit, our university assigned video call classes were poor quality and less engaging. One day i started reading out of the reference book and found the language (which i used to think was complex) to be simple. my strategy to self...

nah just any numerical question that can be deciphered into multiple meanings.

Summary:: hi everyone, i have always wondered whenever i am solving problems in preparation for exams, if other people see the problems that i encounter the same way i do. so, i decided i would write a post and collect perspectives. the way i see it exam problems can be classified in two...

thanks for not roasting me. i also prefer the SI system, but i could only find this book in the inch system.

you're right Mr.baluncore, it is the problem, thanks :)

hi everyone, In a problem where we have to find the change in length of a steel bar and a wooden beam, while calculating the change in length the author multiplied the entire thing by 12 I put all the values in the above equation and still couldn't account for the 12. Thinking of it...

I got the answer, thanks to someone named NRG99 solution i found: using the triangle law of forces as suggested by NRP99 Now that i think on it, i was too concerned about why it was that 18000 and 9000 were written separately and if they had any physics significance turns out it was just a...

@berkeman thanks for replying, i don't know where to begin, i skipped the question for now i only have used method of joints where i did: assumed equilibrium conditions and hence did, 1) sum of all horizontal forces = 0 2) sum of all vertical forces = 0 3) all moment about a point = 0 and...

xyz