Paul Colby's latest activity

By this view, why isn’t QM more understandable to you than classical physics? It’s clearly a better theory. All the things known about...

It may well happen that this deeper understanding will be even less understandable in the sense that people find QM at the moment. I see...

One comment, $$dS = \frac{\delta Q}{T} $$ was know from thermodynamics. Unclear that atoms were even a thing when this form of...

Inequality with QM is by far the more interesting question. People definitely get benefits from reformulating a problem in different...

If it is a new theory, the authors clearly don't know either.

A search on the arxiv number of the paper didn't turn up any other threads here on PF. So I think we're good.

It's beyond my depth but I saw a recent paper Strings from almost nothing that sounds interesting to me. If this has been discussed...

What I understood from...

I agree. In philosophy any statement X may be argued as well as any statement not X with no acceptable means of determining which, if...

Clearly, I can’t. Which is also my point. Neither has anyone else. I’m also not the one employing such a term.

Ah, ok. This references several papers by Jacob Barandes, whose work has been discussed in previous PF threads. This one is probably the...

So, dressing the same physics up in a different mathematical framework definitely can have value. However, how is this mathematical...

And, such a tractable problem at that.

Here's a nice review paper from 2023: Proton decay. You can probably find more up-to-date info by using Google Scholar to search for...

The quantum computers use networks of entangled qubits.