PeroK's latest activity

And, my broader argument is that the more things AI can do and the more emergent characteristics it develops, the more things are deemed...

To put it in formal terms, my original argument was: Major hypothesis: only intelligent things can lie (*) Minor hypothesis: this LLM...

Logic has nothing directly to do with the factual accuracy of the hypotheses. It's quite ironic to be discussing AI and be bombarded...

Well done! It seems way more than a few to me! And that image of Monte Bianco is fantastic! I plan on visiting more places in the...

That role is interpretation dependent. In some interpretations, such as the MWI, there is no actual randomness anywhere; everything is...

The paper that @PeroK provided gave a decent definition of "deception" for their paper. It is: "We define deception as the systematic...

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266638992400103X

I'm coming to the conclusion that you have no conception that an LLM is more than a few lines of imperative procedural code!

And, of course, Monte Bianco:

I've done a few great mountains in Italy: Monte Disgrazia, Piz Badile (traverse from Switzerland), Gran Paradiso (three times); Dent...

As of now, unfortunately, zero: most of my hikes take place on M.Etna, with my friends, though recently we'd been exploring new places...

In my opinion, this is a red herring. An AI is an engineered product. We do not accept harms from engineered products simply because...

If I had said, for example, that the ability to play the piano is an aspect of intelligence, then would your response be that "not all...

I'm not trying to prove anything. First, I never said that when an LLM gets something wrong it is a lie. But, there are documented...

The false syllogisms are coming thick and fast.