Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Trending
Log in
Register
What's new
Latest activity
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Style variation
System
Light
Dark
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
PeterDonis's latest activity
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Importance of Hanbury Brown and Twiss experiment
.
Yes. You have one light beam coming from a source, which is split by a beam splitter, and then you have two detectors, and you look for...
Wednesday, 9:12 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Importance of Hanbury Brown and Twiss experiment
.
It would help if you would give specific references for where you read or were told these things.
Wednesday, 9:10 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Importance of Hanbury Brown and Twiss experiment
.
A single Stern-Gerlach experiment is not a "correlation experiment". To do a correlation experiment with Stern-Gerlach devices, you need...
Wednesday, 9:09 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
The structure would have to be narrow enough for the variation in ##r## for a transverse beam to be negligible. Otherwise its proper...
Wednesday, 8:54 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
No, that's not the claim that was made. Here's the claim that was made: The beam is supposed to be held static against gravity in...
Wednesday, 7:58 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
I hadn't looked at it in detail because I was focusing on the first part and wanting to understand it. Having now looked at it, I'm not...
Wednesday, 6:22 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
You don't seem to understand that the proper acceleration is determined by the beam's worldline. You can't adjust it by applying...
Wednesday, 6:16 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
It occurred to me after posting #116 that by "local density" you might have meant something more like "local proper number density of...
Wednesday, 3:30 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
I'm not sure you can do that. If you build the object in flat spacetime in an unstressed state, and then move it to hovering statically...
Wednesday, 3:16 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
Depends on what you're trying to show. What I was trying to show is that I can take a rod built in flat spacetime with proper length...
Wednesday, 2:07 PM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
Nothing that I said depends on the material model. The details of exactly what stresses will be present for an object described by a...
Wednesday, 1:34 PM
PeterDonis
reacted to
iste's post
in the thread
A
Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality
with
Like
.
But it doesn't seem to me that there is any preferred basis of configurations. Surely, Barandes formulation doesn't stop you from...
Wednesday, 11:57 AM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
Here, I'll even give a simple example for you to address the issue with. I build a rod in flat spacetime, in free fall. It has proper...
Wednesday, 11:31 AM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Euclidean geometry and gravity
.
It's not an argument, it's a definition of what proper acceleration is and what it means physically. You can't say that all of the...
Wednesday, 11:26 AM
PeterDonis
replied to the thread
I
Question about discussions around quantum interpretations
.
As I said, every QM interpretation has features that are unpalatable. It's just a question of what kinds of unpalatability you prefer to...
Wednesday, 11:17 AM
Forums
Back
Top