PeterDonis's latest activity

"Pure chance" wouldn't make it happen every single time. No, because "chance" would mean you would get different results on different...

That isn't the way cluster decomposition is presented in the literature, though. There's no claim that it breaks down for measurements...

This would need to be experimentally tested. They don't give any specific numbers, but there are experiments showing Bell inequality...

That's an invariant which is due to the invariant expansion scalar, yes.

This paper basically seems to be saying that the correlations that break factorizability don't vanish when you look at the correct...

Yes, when @jbriggs444 said "nothing is moving", he was (implicitly) using a comoving coordinate system. That's the most common...

Not really no. The viewpoint that "nothing is moving through space, but space itself is expanding", and the viewpoint that "objects are...

You can't make this statement without specifying a coordinate chart. There is no such thing as "moving" or "not moving" in any absolute...

From what I can see, the article (and its first part--what you linked to is the second part) talks about QBism and consistent histories...

Note, though, that factorizability is how we would intuitively express the cluster decomposition principle. So this doesn't really help...

It's not just that we have no direct experience with the quantum world. It's that we do have tons of direct experience of a world that...

Thread closed for moderation.

The set of comoving objects. Comoving objects are objects that see the universe as homogeneous and isotropic (the same everywhere and in...

Unfortunately that's not possible. In classical physics, position and momentum each have their own independent configuration spaces...

As @Nugatory said, we have reports on this user and the moderators are taking appropriate action. For future reference, @sandy stone...