Recent content by PeterDonis
-
B Why do we use expanding metric?
Where here "expanding" means "has a positive expansion scalar", which is an invariant property of a congruence.- PeterDonis
- Post #15
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
A Assumptions of Hawking-Penrose 1970 Singularity Theorem
Why do you think this is "worth drawing a line under"?- PeterDonis
- Post #23
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
I can no longer render LaTeX
Looks ok now, yes.- PeterDonis
- Post #66
- Forum: Feedback and Announcements
-
I can no longer render LaTeX
Testing: ##p = w \rho##.- PeterDonis
- Post #65
- Forum: Feedback and Announcements
-
I can no longer render LaTeX
I'm having a somewhat different problem: whatever is going on in the editor changes my LaTeX to symbols like those from the "insert symbol" dropdown, but only after I hit "Post". It previews as LaTeX but posts as symbols. That is most emphatically not the behavior I want or expect. For one...- PeterDonis
- Post #61
- Forum: Feedback and Announcements
-
A Assumptions of Hawking-Penrose 1970 Singularity Theorem
It's a theorem about spacetime models using General Relativity. Such models can include stress-energy that has an equation of state that can only be accounted for by some kind of quantum theory, but the quantum theory itself doesn't appear in the spacetime model. In other words, even if we're...- PeterDonis
- Post #20
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
I can no longer render LaTeX
Can you revert to a previous version that is known not to have this problem?- PeterDonis
- Post #60
- Forum: Feedback and Announcements
-
A Assumptions of Hawking-Penrose 1970 Singularity Theorem
I've already explained that: anything with an equation of state ##p = w \rho## where ##w < −1/3## violates the energy conditions that are one of the assumptions of the singularity theorem. Anything that can cause inflation falls into that category.- PeterDonis
- Post #19
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
A Assumptions of Hawking-Penrose 1970 Singularity Theorem
Not exactly. ##w## is the ratio of pressure to density. For the simplest model of inflation (which works just like a cosmological constant), ##w = -1##, meaning ##p = - \rho##. So all three pressures (since they all are equal to ##p## in this model) are equal to minus the energy density. Yes...- PeterDonis
- Post #17
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
A Strong Progenitor Age Bias in Supernova Cosmology
That shouldn't be possible with a cosmological constant, because the energy density of matter and radiation can only decrease with expansion, so once the universe has expanded to the point where the cosmological constant dominates, it should keep dominating (i.e., expansion should keep...- PeterDonis
- Post #30
- Forum: Cosmology
-
I Angular Momentum Vector and Its Magnitude
Who said the superposition had to be equal?- PeterDonis
- Post #7
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
I Question about photon entanglement and causality
Thanks, that makes it much clearer what experiment you're talking about. Unfortunately, your OP doesn't really give a good description of either the experiment or what your question is about it, so I'm not sure how to respond. But briefly: As the Wikipedia page notes, there is no actual...- PeterDonis
- Post #4
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
I Question about photon entanglement and causality
Where? Please give a reference.- PeterDonis
- Post #2
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
A Assumptions of Hawking-Penrose 1970 Singularity Theorem
No worries, post as you can. I hope you feel better soon.- PeterDonis
- Post #14
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
A Assumptions of Hawking-Penrose 1970 Singularity Theorem
Yes. Not "never". Just not in the last two billion years. Inflation does cause accelerated expansion, yes. In our best current model, that occurred in the very early universe. Yes. In cosmology, we model matter, radiation, dark energy, and the field that causes inflation as fluids with an...- PeterDonis
- Post #12
- Forum: Special and General Relativity