pines-demon's latest activity
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Does a qubit break interference in the double slit experiment?.I’m not quoting (myself). I am quoting Jacob Barandes in a podcast. No. Imagine that the qubit is given by the spin of a neutron. Let’s...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Does a qubit break interference in the double slit experiment?.The screen will measure the particle, but does that imply a given result for the qubit?
-
Ppines-demon reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Does a qubit break interference in the double slit experiment? with
Like.
That isn't a quote from @pines-demon. It's @pines-demon quoting from the transcript of the podcast he linked to. -
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Is Toponium a Reality Despite Top Quark's Rapid Decay?.How many times has this been claimed before?
-
PIf we have ##\psi (0)= \sum_m c_m \psi_m## at ##t=0##, then ##\psi(t)=\sum_m c_m e^{\frac{-iE_m t }{\hbar}} \psi_m## so ##\langle H...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Electron energy in atoms.Oh so you want a dynamic state (changing in time) but with stationary expectation value? But then the issue is that you never measure...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Electron energy in atoms.This is not true, unless I am reading it wrongly.
-
PQuantum mechanics
-
Ppines-demon posted the thread I Does a qubit break interference in the double slit experiment? in Quantum Physics.According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread A What is the connection between entanglement and the no-cloning theorem?.Maybe start by telling us WHY you think there is a connection. There are many connections that could be made but knowing the context may...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.This is not possible. If the classical and quantum set ups give similar results then neither of them violates Bell inequalities. Most...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread Predictions for the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025 (results: John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis).Maybe this year an economist will win the physics prize: (Jokes aside Hopfield deserved the prize, the connection of his work with spin...
-
Ppines-demon reacted to Haborix's post in the thread Predictions for the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025 (results: John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis) with
Haha.
OP seems to assume it will be awarded for work related to Physics. Recent practice shows that isn't a safe assumption o0) -
Ppines-demon reacted to Golden hunter's post in the thread Predictions for the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025 (results: John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis) with
Informative.
Hau and Harris revolved mainly around electromagnetically induced transparency and slow / stopped light (in ultracold gases) ... -
Ppines-demon replied to the thread Predictions for the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025 (results: John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis).She has often been nominated for the Nobel with Stephen E. Harris (Clarivate 2012).
