Recent content by Refraction
-
R
Finding Solutions to a Quartic Equation
Thanks, that worked perfectly!- Refraction
- Post #11
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
R
Finding Solutions to a Quartic Equation
Would there be a reasonably simple way to get to the two results given without substituting them into the first equation? I have a feeling that I'm supposed to do it that way, and not just by replacing x with the answers given. It seems like I could get to that form with some rearranging and...- Refraction
- Post #9
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
R
Finding Solutions to a Quartic Equation
what did you mean by putting the expression given as x into the equation? Putting it into the second one there/the other way around?- Refraction
- Post #6
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
R
Finding Solutions to a Quartic Equation
Sorry, I left out a part of the equation above. It was actually x = [what I already gave], I've edited that in now. It just seems like that way it would be easier to rearrange into the form needed, I'm not 100% sure about that though.- Refraction
- Post #4
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
R
Finding Solutions to a Quartic Equation
Homework Statement I've been given the following quartic equation in a question: x = (1 + 2a + a^2)x - (2a + 3a^2 + a^3)x^2 + (2a^2 + 2a^3)x^3 - a^3x^4 and need to show that two of the solutions (that aren't 0 and 1) can be given by: x= \frac{(2+a) \pm \sqrt{a^2 - 4}}{2a} 2. The attempt...- Refraction
- Thread
- Cubic
- Replies: 10
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
R
Taylor series expansion for xln(x) with x = 1
By the coefficient t for ln(1+t), do you mean when it would be t ln(1+t)? (making it (x-1)ln(x) after the substitution)- Refraction
- Post #13
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
R
Taylor series expansion for xln(x) with x = 1
t=x-1 and when t=0, x=1 ? I just realized that for a function like xln(1+x) you can find the series for ln(1+x) and multiply the compact form by x to give the expansion for xln(1+x). It looks like I need to do something similar here, but I'm not sure what that last step would be now. I...- Refraction
- Post #11
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
R
Taylor series expansion for xln(x) with x = 1
I'm still not having much luck figuring this out, any chance you could be a bit more specific about what you meant?- Refraction
- Post #9
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
R
Taylor series expansion for xln(x) with x = 1
f'(x) is ln(x) + 1, and in this question it's at x = 1 not x = 0 (which wouldn't be defined for f'(x) anyway) so it's f'(1) = ln(1) + 1 = 1 in that case.- Refraction
- Post #7
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
R
Taylor series expansion for xln(x) with x = 1
Sorry, it was supposed to be t in there, anyway I'll see if I can figure out what you meant.- Refraction
- Post #5
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
R
Taylor series expansion for xln(x) with x = 1
I guess it would be t - (t^2)/2 + (t^3)/3 - (t^4)/4 + (t^5)/5 etc. if it was about t = 0? Not sure what you mean by the relationship between x and t though.- Refraction
- Post #3
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
R
Taylor series expansion for xln(x) with x = 1
Homework Statement For f(x) = xln(x), find the taylor series expansion of f(x) about x = 1, and write the infinite series in compact form. 2. The attempt at a solution I can find the expansion itself fine, these are the first few terms: 0 + (x-1) + \frac{(x-1)^{2}}{2!} -...- Refraction
- Thread
- Series Taylor Taylor series
- Replies: 13
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
R
In terms of n, 3, 7, 13, 27, 53, 107
The numerator kind of looks like a_{n+2}=2a_{n}+a_{n+1} to me, so it would be like this: c4 = (2*2) + 3 = 7 c5 = (2*3) + 7 = 13 c6 = (2*7) + 13 = 27 etc, it only works when n > 2 which seems to fit into what you mentioned as well. Hope that helps a bit!- Refraction
- Post #2
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
R
Changing the Order of Integration for a Double Integral: How Do I Evaluate This?
Well the area bounded by the lines looks something like this: So with the reversed order of integration (dy dx) for the first double integral, R1, the inner integral is from y = 0 to y = x, and the outer integral is from x = 0 to x = 3.- Refraction
- Post #7
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
R
Changing the Order of Integration for a Double Integral: How Do I Evaluate This?
The line was x = y in the original question, I just used it as y = x for when the order is reversed (so it's in the first half of the reversed order integral now).- Refraction
- Post #5
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help