Recent content by rohitarura

  1. R

    How Do You Calculate Velocity and Acceleration on a Helical Path Around a Cone?

    Thanks Sir(sorry). Just a bit more confusion But \omega=kt which is not constant as u took in previous post..,i.e., it has an angular acceleration Then how to explain it?? Thank you once again...
  2. R

    How Do You Calculate Velocity and Acceleration on a Helical Path Around a Cone?

    i couldn't understand only the 1st 3 expressions of z , r, and theta that u have wrtten, in them, they can be written only if there is a linear relation between z and t', r and t'.so how can we say there is linear relation between them? Sorry Sir, it may be a silly question but only that is...
  3. R

    How Do You Calculate Velocity and Acceleration on a Helical Path Around a Cone?

    Finally, now I have got the opportunity to sit on a PC.Earlier, i only add access through mobile. If vz is the velocity along the vertical axis of the cone, \omega be the angular velocity = kt z be the z coordinate w.r.t. the tip of the cone. r be the radius of its path in cone So...
  4. R

    How Do You Calculate Velocity and Acceleration on a Helical Path Around a Cone?

    We have to neglect gravity and any other force like friction, air drag are to be neglected.. The particle starts at t=0 with r(0) radius of cone. And it moves in a spiral path such that radius of spiral keeps increasing or it moves towards open side of the cone.. What i am most confused...
  5. R

    How Do You Calculate Velocity and Acceleration on a Helical Path Around a Cone?

    A particle moves on the surface of right circular cone of semi cone angle alpha, coaxial with z axis along a helical path of fixed pitch L starting from some r(0) radius. The angular velocity of the particle omega varies linearly with time, omega=kt. Determine velocity and acceleration of the...
  6. R

    Proving Acceleration of A ≤ Acceleration of B

    Thank you very very much Sir.I'm very satisfied with your valuable views...Thanks
  7. R

    Proving Acceleration of A ≤ Acceleration of B

    It tells that it is not necessary that the acceleration of A always be less or equal to the acceleration of B...But my fellows says the opposite?He says if 1 force is pulling such a system then acc. of the block A can't be greater than that of the block on which the force is applied i.e.,block B??
  8. R

    Proving Acceleration of A ≤ Acceleration of B

    Earlier i accidentally took its opposite Taking,kx=4N,will make it..
  9. R

    Proving Acceleration of A ≤ Acceleration of B

    Ya, kx=1N? So, what does this imply?
  10. R

    Proving Acceleration of A ≤ Acceleration of B

    But, the forces on each keep varying?? We can have the equations, 4-kx=2aB kx=aA k being the unknown spring constant,and x is extension in it.. If we can prove, a(B)-a(A)=2-kx/3 can be negative then its done...
  11. R

    Proving Acceleration of A ≤ Acceleration of B

    Only one force acts and that on B only.
  12. R

    Proving Acceleration of A ≤ Acceleration of B

    Homework Statement Question : two masses MA = 1 kg and MB = 2 kg are connected by a massless spring as shown in figure. A force of 4 N acts on the 2 kg mass. http://www.vidyamandir.com//displayImageServlet?appletImgId=8a7b221f1fcc7894011ff9cccfe412f0 Is it necessary that the acceleration of A...