Proving Acceleration of A ≤ Acceleration of B

  • Thread starter Thread starter rohitarura
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two masses connected by a spring, where a force is applied to one of the masses. The original poster questions whether the acceleration of the first mass (A) is always less than or equal to the acceleration of the second mass (B) under the influence of the applied force.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the forces acting on each mass and the implications of those forces on their respective accelerations. There is a discussion about the varying forces due to the spring and how to express the net forces acting on each block.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants examining different scenarios and values for the spring force. Some participants suggest that it is possible for the acceleration of A to exceed that of B, while others express skepticism about this possibility. The conversation highlights differing interpretations of the system's behavior.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of specific information regarding the spring constant and the extent of the spring's extension, which is central to the discussion. Participants are encouraged to consider various values for the spring force to explore the relationship between the accelerations of the two masses.

rohitarura
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Question :
two masses MA = 1 kg and MB = 2 kg are connected by a massless spring as shown in figure. A force of 4 N acts on the 2 kg mass.
http://www.vidyamandir.com//displayImageServlet?appletImgId=8a7b221f1fcc7894011ff9cccfe412f0 Is it necessary that the acceleration of A always be less or equal to the acceleration of B?
If yes,then prove it...If no then also prove it,please.
2. The attempt at a solution
I thought this way..Working in centre of mass's frame,both blocks seem to oscillate about it.So,at some instant both will have same accelerations w.r.t. Centre of mass then, using pseudo force concept the net acc. of the block be will get greater than that of block A..
Correct me if i am wrong...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


What forces act on A? On B?
 


Only one force acts and that on B only.
 


rohitarura said:
Only one force acts and that on B only.
There's only one external force acting on the two-block system, but to find the acceleration of each block consider each block separately.

What forces act on each? Compare the expressions for the net force on each, then see if you can draw any conclusions.
 


But, the forces on each keep varying??

We can have the equations,
4-kx=2aB
kx=aA

k being the unknown spring constant,and x is extension in it..

If we can prove,
a(B)-a(A)=2-kx/3 can be negative then its done...
 


If you are considering block B alone, why do you have twice the mass of B?
 


rohitarura said:
But, the forces on each keep varying??
Right, the spring force can be almost anything. That's the key.

We can have the equations,
4-kx=2aB
kx=aA
OK. So then:
aB = 2 -kx/2
aA = kx

Can you think of a value of kx that makes aA > aB ?
 


Ya, kx=1N?

So, what does this imply?
 


rohitarura said:
Ya, kx=1N?
No, that value makes aB = 3/2 & aA = 1. Choose another. (What value would make aB = 0?)
 
  • #10


Earlier i accidentally took its opposite

Taking,kx=4N,will make it..
 
  • #11


rohitarura said:
Taking,kx=4N,will make it..
OK. So what does that tell you?
 
  • #12


It tells that it is not necessary that the acceleration of A always be less or equal to the acceleration of B...But my fellows says the opposite?He says if 1 force is pulling such a system then acc. of the block A can't be greater than that of the block on which the force is applied i.e.,block B??
 
  • #13


rohitarura said:
It tells that it is not necessary that the acceleration of A always be less or equal to the acceleration of B...
OK.
But my fellows says the opposite?He says if 1 force is pulling such a system then acc. of the block A can't be greater than that of the block on which the force is applied i.e.,block B??
Ask him why he thinks that.

No information is given about how much the spring is stretched, so nothing stops us from imagining a situation where the stretch is as much as we like.
 
  • #14


Thank you very very much Sir.I'm very satisfied with your valuable views...Thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
825
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
61
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K