Recent content by SSJ2
-
S
Engineering Physics degree, taking Fundamental Engineering test
yea, I wish i could have taken the non computer based exam. I do better with pencil and paper on a desk. But oh well ;P. Such is life i suppose.- SSJ2
- Post #9
- Forum: STEM Career Guidance
-
S
Engineering Physics degree, taking Fundamental Engineering test
Is it three? I could be wrong. Have to go back and check.- SSJ2
- Post #7
- Forum: STEM Career Guidance
-
S
Engineering Physics degree, taking Fundamental Engineering test
Thats correct. The PE is the second part of the exam that requires 7 years of experience after you pass the FE or the first part. I got approved to take the first part and got my foot in the door. Did so by having my education evaluated(for a fee) as it is not ABET accredited. You can have yours...- SSJ2
- Post #5
- Forum: STEM Career Guidance
-
S
Engineering Physics degree, taking Fundamental Engineering test
No, not really. Just wanted to let all the physics majors out there know that its possible to become a licensed engineer without a engineering degree depending on state. :) Just took some diligence ;P. Anyways off to start reviewing :).- SSJ2
- Post #3
- Forum: STEM Career Guidance
-
S
Engineering Physics degree, taking Fundamental Engineering test
Just wanted to let the forum know that through some diligence I have been approved to take the Fundamental Engineering test in South Carolina with a B.S. in Physics. I took about a extra year worth of advanced engineering classes along with skipped all freshman and sophomore engineering...- SSJ2
- Thread
- Degree Engineering Fundamental Physics Physics degree Test
- Replies: 10
- Forum: STEM Career Guidance
-
S
Calc Energy to Take 1,112kg Car 1.2km Up Mtn: 3SF
dont forget...when dealing with large numbers its best to include as many sig figs in your calculations as possible, use 9.81 instead of 9.8 and you will get something that you can round to 1.31E7 J- SSJ2
- Post #2
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
S
Help with Electric charges using coulomb's law
im pretty sure you would do Fnet = F1 + F2 where F1 is the distance from the third charge to one charge F2 is the distance from the third charge to the second point charge oh and the equation you gave is the magnitude remove the absolute value and treat each force as a vector- SSJ2
- Post #2
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
S
Ferromagnetism versus Paramagnetism
really, it comes down to the spin of the system. Ferromagnetic implies that all the spin of the electrons point in the same direction. anti-ferromagnetism is when half of the electrons are pointing in the same direction and the other half are pointing in the opposite direction...- SSJ2
- Post #7
- Forum: Atomic and Condensed Matter
-
S
How was avagadros number was calculated
i guess i have two questions... 1) the first is although I know the calculation of the number is based around the mass of 12 grams of carbon-12 and that there are 6.02*10^23 atoms here. How was it found that this many atoms of carbon was found in the 12 grams? 2) my second question is...- SSJ2
- Thread
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Other Physics Topics
-
S
Deriving fractional atomic coordination numbers
hmm, i guess in the end i was wondering how the position of the atoms in a fcc structure are determined. i know the lattice parameters are determined experimentally. But how are the positions of the atoms determined- SSJ2
- Post #5
- Forum: Atomic and Condensed Matter
-
S
Deriving fractional atomic coordination numbers
why do the units matter...NaCl has at halite structure...or the atomic positions of (0,0,0) and(.5,.5,.5) in fractional coordinates for the unit cell maybe i didnt explain clearly enough... let me try again So I know that the NaCl unit cell is based on a FCC lattice with a basis of Na Cl atoms...- SSJ2
- Post #3
- Forum: Atomic and Condensed Matter
-
S
Deriving fractional atomic coordination numbers
hi guys i was wondering how the coordination numbers for the atomic positions of atoms in crystals such as NaCl are derived ...more specifically why is Na at (0,0,0) and Cl at (1/2,1/2,1/2) and not (0,0,0) and (1/4,1/4,1/4) of course this is in fractional coordinates- SSJ2
- Thread
- Atomic deriving fractional Numbers
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Atomic and Condensed Matter