Gravity and spin 2 representation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
I'm not at all involved in QG but from far away I noticed :

Spin 2 representations are 5x5 matrices.

But in gravity what mathematical objects are quantized ? If it's the metric then it's a 4x4 matrix so that cannot be that.

Or : how does quantization reveal a 5x5 matrix ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jk22 said:
Spin 2 representations are 5x5 matrices.
This is true if, and only if, the object which carries the spin-2 representation has non-zero mass. In this case, the (massive) irreducible spin-2 representation (of the Poincare group) can be represented by a conserved, traceless and symmetric rank-2 tensor field: Consider the symmetric tensor field (i.e., we have 10 components) [itex]h^{\mu\nu} = h^{\nu\mu}[/itex], take its trace [itex]h = \eta_{\rho \sigma}h^{\rho\sigma}[/itex] then form the following traceless symmetric tensor field [tex]G^{\mu\nu} = h^{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{4} \eta^{\mu\nu} h .[/tex] Now [itex]G^{\mu\nu}[/itex] has [itex]10 - 1= 9[/itex] components because [itex]G^{\mu\nu} = G^{\nu\mu}[/itex] and [itex]\eta_{\mu\nu}G^{\mu\nu} = 0[/itex]. So, to reduce the number of components to 5, we need to impose 4 more conditions: Usually, in field theory [itex]G^{\mu\nu}[/itex] is generated by a conserved source [itex]T^{\mu\nu} \ , \partial_{\mu}T^{\mu\nu} = 0[/itex], and satisfies the second-order equation [tex]( \partial^{2} + m^{2} ) G^{\mu\nu} = \alpha T^{\mu\nu} \ .[/tex] Therefore, the required 4 conditions on [itex]G^{\mu\nu}[/itex] are given by [itex]\partial_{\mu}G^{\mu\nu} = 0[/itex]. So, when a tensor field [itex]G^{\mu\nu}[/itex] satisfies the conditions,[itex]G^{\mu\nu} = G^{\nu\mu} \ , \eta_{\mu\nu}G^{\mu\nu} = 0[/itex] and [itex]\partial_{\mu}G^{\mu\nu} = 0[/itex], we say that [itex]G^{\mu\nu}[/itex] carries a massive irreducible spin-2 representation of the Poincare group.

In the massless case, we can show that the appropriate tensor is given by [tex]G^{\mu\nu} = h^{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2} \eta^{\mu\nu} h \ .[/tex] Notice, in this case, that [itex]G^{\mu\nu}[/itex] is still symmetric, but not traceless. So this tensor has 10 components. Again, we require [itex]G^{\mu\nu}[/itex] to be identically conserved, i.e., [itex]\partial_{\mu}G^{\mu\nu} = 0[/itex] (because, in this case the equation of motion has the form [itex]\partial^{2}G^{\mu\nu} = \beta T^{\mu\nu}[/itex]). Therefore, the number of components of [itex]G^{\mu\nu}[/itex] has been reduced to [itex]10 - 4 = 6[/itex]. However, we can show that theory is invariant under the following “gauge” transformations [tex]h^{\mu\nu} \to h^{\mu\nu} - \partial^{\mu} \chi^{\nu} - \partial^{\nu} \chi^{\mu} \ ,[/tex]where [itex]\chi^{\mu}[/itex] is an arbitrary 4-vector field. This allows us to fix 4 out of the above 6 components of [itex]G^{\mu\nu}[/itex]. Thus, there are 2 and only 2 independent components left in [itex]G^{\mu\nu}[/itex] as it should be for massless fields. So, the massless “spin”-2 irreducible representation of the Poincare group is carried by a symmetric rank-2 tensor with only 2 independent components.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeterDonis, A. Neumaier, Demystifier and 3 others