Which-Path from Global Momentum Measurement in Double Slit

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wnvl2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Double slit experiment
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of global momentum measurements in the double-slit experiment, particularly regarding which-path information and interference visibility. It is established that a global momentum measurement of the slit screen yields which-path information only if the recoil states are distinguishable, leading to a decrease in interference visibility. In symmetric configurations, where the screen receives a net momentum kick, the measurement does not provide which-path information, thus preserving interference. The conversation references key papers, including one from arXiv that explores these concepts in depth.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the double-slit experiment and its implications in quantum mechanics.
  • Familiarity with the uncertainty principle and its effects on measurement outcomes.
  • Knowledge of momentum exchange and recoil states in quantum systems.
  • Experience with interpreting scientific papers in quantum physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the uncertainty principle in quantum measurements.
  • Examine the experimental setups discussed in the referenced arXiv papers.
  • Research methods to engineer symmetric two-slit experiments that encode which-path information.
  • Explore the concept of distinguishability in quantum states and its impact on interference patterns.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, experimental physicists, and students interested in the foundations of quantum mechanics and the nuances of interference phenomena in double-slit experiments.

wnvl2
Messages
64
Reaction score
14
Consider the standard double-slit experiment with photons (or massive particles), where a screen containing two narrow slits is illuminated by a coherent source and an interference pattern is observed on a distant detection screen. Assume that the slit screen is not rigidly fixed but is instead allowed to recoil, so that momentum exchange between the particle and the screen is, in principle, possible.

Suppose that one performs a measurement of the total momentum of the entire slit screen at the moment a particle passes through it, without resolving any spatial information about the individual slits and without directly measuring the particle’s position. The question is whether such a global momentum measurement provides which-path information and, consequently, whether it affects the visibility of the interference pattern.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is basically what you're asking:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0101157

A global momentum measurement of the screen only yields which-path information if the recoil states are distinguishable. When they are, interference visibility drops accordingly. This occurs because the uncertainty principle requires the slit positions to become indefinite, smearing out the fringes on the detection screen.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba, wnvl2, haushofer and 3 others
In the paper, the experimental setup is asymmetric in the sense that the which–path measurement effectively takes place in only one arm of the interferometer. My question is whether, in a more symmetric configuration—where the momentum transferred by the electron is absorbed by the detector or screen as a whole—the interference pattern would still disappear. In particular, if the entire screen receives a net momentum kick (for example to the left) and this momentum transfer is measured, can one then infer whether the particle passed through the left or the right slit, and does this necessarily imply the loss of interference?
 
Like before, a global measurement of the screen’s total momentum gives which-path information only if the two recoil states are distinguishable. In a symmetric two-slit experiment where the screen merely receives a kick to the left, that kick is tied to the particle’s outgoing transverse momentum, not which-path. So measuring it does not let you infer the path and does not by itself eliminate interference.

That said, you could definitely try to engineer a symmetric two-slit experiment that did encode which-path information. There's a ton of papers out there with different ways to mark which-path, here is another paper I think that's closer to what you're looking for then: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.19801.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and wnvl2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
989
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
4K