Raucousness In Music

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The evaluation of music heavily relies on the concept of raucousness, which divides listeners into two distinct groups: those who prefer raucous music, such as death metal, and those who favor non-raucous genres like European classical music. Raucousness is primarily centered around the frequency of 1000 Hertz, where reducing this frequency results in less raucous sound, while boosting it enhances raucousness. This phenomenon is limited in its effect but is a crucial aspect of music perception.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sound frequency and its impact on music perception
  • Familiarity with music genres, particularly raucous and non-raucous categories
  • Knowledge of audio manipulation techniques
  • Basic concepts of music theory related to dynamics and texture
NEXT STEPS
  • Research sound frequency manipulation techniques in audio production
  • Explore the characteristics of different music genres, focusing on raucousness
  • Study the impact of frequency on listener preferences in music psychology
  • Learn about the role of dynamics in classical music compositions
USEFUL FOR

Music enthusiasts, audio engineers, and anyone interested in the psychological effects of sound frequencies on music appreciation.

Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,742
Reaction score
3,025
Possibly the single most important thing in the (subjective) evaluation of music is raucousness. I've noticed that most people will listen either only to raucous music or only to non-raucous music. The two groups don't overlap much. Death metal is the most raucous, easy listening (do they still call it that?) with lush strings the least.

It's possible to add or subtract some of the raucousness from music. It centers around 1000 Hertz. Reduce that and what one hears is less raucous, boost for more. This effect is limited but there.

European classical music is non-raucous, with the exception of some violin soloists or Penderecki symphonies.
 
  • Agree
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint
Science news on Phys.org
Why is death metal ‘raucous’ and classical music not? Most death metal is very precise music that requires real musicianship to play and the overall aesthetic of metal is not dissimilar to a broad swathe of classical music. Or are you defining the term by the amount of upper partials in the tones- ie distorted electric guitar has a lot, a flute has almost none?

 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint
BWV said:
are you defining the term by the amount of upper partials in the tones- ie distorted electric guitar has a lot, a flute has almost none?


Yes that's it. Tone. Rough tone vs. smooth tone. A highly distorted electric guitar overlaid with screaming is about as raucous as you can get. Kazoos are raucous. Note that Adolf Sax's instruments when used by classical musicians yield a smooth tone, while jazzers are often raucous, Paul Desmond notwithstanding.

Extremely trebly sounds such as The Beatles' use of guitars are raucous.



Are punishingly loud drums raucous? Recently I attended a concert where the bass drum was so loud it was like getting pummeled in the chest. I had gone to considerable lengths to be there but nevertheless left after one number and listened from the lobby shielded by a thick wall. It wasn't much good but it was better than nothing. At the end of the concert there were eleven others doing the same thing. But most must have found it OK because they were still in there cheering loudly. Well I guess not raucous. But who cares anyway.
 
Last edited:
I'd say the four most important factors in personal preference in music are raucous vs. smooth, harmony vs. dissonance, tempo, and major vs. minor. Almost everyone prefers harmony over dissonance so we can set that aside. Then we can partition music listeners into eight groups. Viet Nam prefers smooth minor key ballads almost exclusively. Japan is the opposite : raucous fast major key is popular. Subsaharan Africa, smooth major fast. China, smooth major ballads. Black Sabbath and AC/DC fans : slow raucous minor. The Offspring : fast raucous minor. Can't think of anything that's smooth minor fast.

There are a number of famous artists who cover most of these bases during their careers.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint
Well now I want an app that will tell me what category I fall into, just by saying yea or nay to a list of music.

I have always wondered what the connections are between the disparate kinds of music I like. Something about chord/key changes, and something about contrast - I do love a good bridge.

I asked Spotify for my yearly preferences by genre, but it does seem to kind of make up fanciful super-niche genres.

So instead, I did it manually:
1767797616530.webp
 
Hornbein said:
I'd say the four most important factors in personal preference in music are raucous vs. smooth, harmony vs. dissonance, tempo, and major vs. minor. Almost everyone prefers harmony over dissonance so we can set that aside. Then we can partition music listeners into eight groups. Viet Nam prefers smooth minor key ballads almost exclusively. Japan is the opposite : raucous fast major key is popular. Subsaharan Africa, smooth major fast. China, smooth major ballads. Black Sabbath and AC/DC fans : slow raucous minor. The Offspring : fast raucous minor. Can't think of anything that's smooth minor fast.

There are a number of famous artists who cover most of these bases during their careers.
Sakura is minor, so how can you generalize about Japan being major? A shakuhachi racous? Is gagaku 'racous'? dissonant? sounds that way to Western ears
 
Stravinsky, Rite of Spring 1913

He goes raucous @ 4.05 but the build up is nice.

 
The best artists creatively speaking can do both styles, if they are styles.

McCartney being a great example.

Listen to "Ram on" then "Monk berry Moon delight," same album.
 
Last edited:
BWV said:
Sakura is minor, so how can you generalize about Japan being major? A shakuhachi racous? Is gagaku 'racous'? dissonant? sounds that way to Western ears
Oh come on. Surely I don't mean to imply that EVERYTHING in Japan is this way. Not even that a majority of their music is fast, major and raucous. Merely that it is more this way than are other nations. It's a strong tendency.

Indeed the national anthem of Japan is slow, minor, and smooth. But it isn't popular there.
 
  • #10
Hornbein said:
Oh come on. Surely I don't mean to imply that EVERYTHING in Japan is this way.
Right so the whole generalization is meaningless. None of your terms are well defined or have much of a musicological basis.
 
  • #11
BWV said:
Right so the whole generalization is meaningless. None of your terms are well defined or have much of a musicological basis.
This isn't mathematics. All terms in music and the arts are loosely defined. If you don't want to play this game, please don't hang around and throw mud.
 
  • #12
Hornbein said:
This isn't mathematics. All terms in music and the arts are loosely defined. If you don't want to play this game, please don't hang around and throw mud.
Is this a game, or amateur musicology? Your OP certainly had the tone of the latter 'The single most important thing in music is <some ill-defined term you made up>' There is a real discipline and tradition to doing what you are attempting
 
  • #13
BWV said:
Is this a game, or amateur musicology? Your OP certainly had the tone of the latter 'The single most important thing in music is <some ill-defined term you made up>' There is a real discipline and tradition to doing what you are attempting
I am not going to continue this squabble.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
14K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
13K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K