stephen h
- 5
- 0
tell what space is within the confines of the universe. discuss all aspects of space and how to identify space.
The discussion centers around the concept of space within the universe, exploring various aspects of its definition and implications for understanding the universe's size and expansion. Participants engage in a broad inquiry into how space is characterized and identified, touching on cosmological models and the role of cosmic radiation.
Participants express differing views on the adequacy of existing references and models of space. There is no consensus on how to approach the definition of space or the sufficiency of current cosmological models.
Some participants note limitations in the generality of references and the need for specific examples or deeper engagement with academic literature. There is an emphasis on the necessity of background knowledge for a meaningful discussion.
We already have a detailed model of this in cosmology. Have you looked at it?stephen h said:defining space will give us an idea of how large the universe is and how it might expand.
in wikipedia what i have read describes space mostly in terms of matter plus cosmic radiation without mention of how they interact to form space or the universe.Ibix said:That is a very broad question. What have you read so far? Why didn't the answer satisfy you?
yes and most references that is have seen are very general. the reference to cosmic radiation could be most revealing. the vast extent of the radiations (all types) far exceeds the imagination and is totally unmentioned and undescribed.PeterDonis said:We already have a detailed model of this in cosmology. Have you looked at it?
What page? Please give a specific link.stephen h said:in wikipedia
What references? Be specific.stephen h said:most references
If a phenomenon exceeds the imagination then perhaps it is time to adopt a mathematical description and reason logically from that. This is vastly preferable to reasoning from dreams and puffery.stephen h said:yes and most references that is have seen are very general. the reference to cosmic radiation could be most revealing. the vast extent of the radiations (all types) far exceeds the imagination and is totally unmentioned and undescribed.
@stephen h note that you marked this thread as "Graduate". If your answer to either of the questions I asked above is "no" (and I suspect your answer to both of them is "no"), then you don't have the background knowledge for a graduate level discussion of this topic. In any case, we need to have an idea of what, if any, background knowledge you do have.PeterDonis said:Have you read any actual textbooks or peer-reviewed papers on cosmology and our best current model of the universe?
Have you read any textbooks or papers on General Relativity, which is the theory we use to build our best current model of the universe?
I think you are probably misunderstanding what you have read.stephen h said:in wikipedia what i have read describes space mostly in terms of matter plus cosmic radiation without mention of how they interact to form space or the universe.
Since the OP has not responded to this, we have changed the level of the thread discussion to "High School".PeterDonis said:@stephen h note that you marked this thread as "Graduate". If your answer to either of the questions I asked above is "no" (and I suspect your answer to both of them is "no"), then you don't have the background knowledge for a graduate level discussion of this topic. In any case, we need to have an idea of what, if any, background knowledge you do have.
Matter and radiation don't make up 'space', they exist within it.stephen h said:in wikipedia what i have read describes space mostly in terms of matter plus cosmic radiation without mention of how they interact to form space or the universe.