Why Do People Laugh? Understanding Laughter & What's Funny

  • Thread starter Thread starter e(ho0n3
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the nature of laughter, its meanings, and what makes something funny. Participants consider various theories and approaches to understanding laughter, including psychological, social, and cultural perspectives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the reasons behind laughter and what constitutes humor.
  • Another participant suggests that there are numerous theories of laughter, hinting at the potential for controversial or biased explanations.
  • A participant expresses interest in behavioral psychology and inquires about ongoing research in the field.
  • One claim is made that laughter is contagious, though no further elaboration is provided.
  • A later reply critiques behavioral psychology as a narrow approach and recommends exploring social and cultural anthropology for a deeper understanding of laughter.
  • Another participant raises a question about the validity of a quote regarding the difference between real and fake smiles, seeking scientific backing.
  • One participant presents a metaphorical view of laughter as a "localized software reboot," suggesting that incongruity in jokes leads to a cognitive reset, drawing parallels between brain function and computer processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of laughter and its study, with no clear consensus on the best approach or explanation. Multiple competing perspectives are present, particularly regarding the fields of psychology and anthropology.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on subjective interpretations and personal opinions, such as the perceived limitations of behavioral psychology. The discussion also touches on the complexity of laughter without resolving the underlying scientific questions.

e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
I don't know if this has been asked already, but does anybody why people laugh? For example, when you here a funny joke, you are inclined to laugh. Why is this? What meaning does laughter have? This also leads me to another question: What makes something funny?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are many theories of laughter.

Judging by the standards of this message board, I can assure you that there will even be a genetico-racist explanation for laughter (something like: "whites invented laughter when they saw how miserable the blacks were doing").



I hope that made you laugh. If it didn't, I'm black ;-)
 
Last edited:
I wanted to take a course on behavioral psychology just to learn about this sort of thing, but I never did. Now I'm left pondering. Is there active research in this area?
 
All I know is that laughter is contagious.
 
e(ho0n3 said:
I wanted to take a course on behavioral psychology just to learn about this sort of thing, but I never did. Now I'm left pondering. Is there active research in this area?

Of course there is.

But why would you take the road into laughter via behavioral psychology? There are many more approaches. Behavioral psychology is pretty boring, but that's my personal opinion.

Why don't you start with a more deep, intellectually challenging route? That of social and cultural anthropology.

They've written quite a lot about the meaning of laughter and how and why it works.

Behavioral psychology is a very small branch of science, and not very self-relfective.
 
New issue: I've heard the quote: "Research shows your body doesn't know the difference between a real smile and a fake one."
Is there real science behind this?
 
Laughter is a localised software reboot. Take a joke for instance. We hear it, its new, its got incongruity, we laugh. The brains software can't deal with the incongruity. The input/output IO map seems to be in error. The language process software reboots. Simple. The incongruity it still there. We have another reboot. Hence the cyclic nature of laughter. After a number of reboots the incongruity becomes less incongruous. Rebooting stops. Think about your computer experience. We need to think about the brain as a software device. It is a computer, it processes information. Can information be processed without software? DNA is software. We feel better after laughter because our ram held concerns have been weakened by the reboot. What else could be explained by bio-rebooting. What about stammering, epilepsy and the biggest reboot of all, the oohh orgasm. Can you count to three during an orgasm. No. Your brain is off-line to you. You could be on another planet. Thinking about the brain as a software device will open a new window to gaze through and look thoughfully upon the human condition. Why not get University Computer Science Departments brainstorming with the
neurologists.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
27K