Which Numbers Remain Unchanged When Added or Multiplied by Themselves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter YesIam
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on identifying numbers that can be added to or multiplied by themselves to yield the same result, specifically focusing on the equation x + x = x * x. The conclusion drawn is that the only solutions to this equation are 2 and 0. However, there is skepticism about the completeness of this conclusion, suggesting that it may be overly definitive. The conversation emphasizes the importance of open-mindedness in mathematical reasoning, cautioning against absolute statements like "only" or "never." The mention of a historical reference to a book from 1943 indicates that this mathematical inquiry is not new, and there is encouragement for further exploration of potential solutions beyond the initial findings. Overall, the thread advocates for deeper thinking and reasoning in mathematics.
YesIam
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
It may be in here, I don't know...but how many other numbers can you think of that can be added to or multiplied by itself and get the same answer such as 2 and 0? There are others.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Numbers that can be added to and multiplied by themselves giving the same answer:

Define the number x. Then, what you're looking for is every x that satisfies:

x+x = x*x

So...

2x=x^2

x^2 - 2x = x (x-2) = 0

Thus, the only two numbers that satisfy this property are 2 and 0.
 
Well Char, I am sorry but this is the regular 'proof' that some people give and really think that it has to be some kind of proof because they have read it somewhere. I try to always be careful and not say 'always or never'...because if I do I realize that I will usually be wrong. Recall the movie, NEVER SAY NEVER. and the reason for the name. If you just think about this for a minute, when you state something like you did, this means...this is it and nothing else can be true...I just know this is right...no one else can be right because 'I am right', etc. I believe you are working the problem backwards, even if it is a problem. Let's call it Math familiarization-you are not the first to jump to this conclusion and you will probably not be the last, and I can't help that. I first saw this in a book printed in 1943. I remember the date because years later I forgot the solution and had to research though publishers records and buy an 'out of print book'. I still remember the name of the book, the author, the publisher and year. But again, if you just state what you did and not think about anything else, I can't help that. But if you really put some time into reasoning, I think that 'maybe' you can come with some other numbers. When you think, "...only..." you are lost from the start. I would think that some good answers will come in...from some where. I will post another little Math thingie-see what you can do with this, okay.
 
Th OP is either missing information or forgot what the exersize was.
 
To some degree, this thread is inspired by PF user erobz's thread "Why do we spend so much time learning grammar in the public school system?" That's why I made a title to this thread that paralleled the title of erobz's thread. I totally disagree with erobz. I created this thread because the curriculum of grammar at Universities is a totally distinct topic from the topic of the curriculum of grammar in public schools. I have noticed that the English grammar of many ( perhaps most)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K