fluidistic
Gold Member
- 3,929
- 276
1. Many people do, sure. In my book dealing with a bank can be called greed, after all it's for your own benefit while you know that banks are evil and caused the 2008 crisis and are not trustable, at least according to Satoshi Nakamoto. But sure, one should always have the choice to either deal with a bank or not (and take the cryptocurrency route for instance). I'd rather pay someone to verify a smart contract than to deal with our archaic banking system as of today, if I had to use a 3rd party (I'd rather not, of course).CynicusRex said:§1 Most people prefer middlemen. What happens when you pay for a product using crypto“currencies” without a middleman and the product is never sent? Your money is gone. A middleman can mediate the trade and reverse the transaction.
§2 “But Ponzi schemes existed with fiat money before cryptocurrencies. Does it mean fiat money is a scam that should be eradicated?”
Fiat money is just that, money. Crypto“currencies” are the scam.
§3 “The sole reason for buying “art pieces” is “number go up” because it doesn't produce any products or services at all ... therefore art is a scam and artists should be ashamed of themselves?”
The primary reason to buy art, for the majority of people, is aesthetics. Those who buy it for money laundering or financial speculation should question their priorities, yes.