Maple vs Mathematica: What's Better for Symbolic Manipulation, ODE, and PDE?

  • Context: Mathematica 
  • Thread starter Thread starter graphic7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maple Mathematica
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of Maple and Mathematica for tasks related to symbolic manipulation, ordinary differential equations (ODE), and partial differential equations (PDE). Participants share their experiences and preferences regarding the two software packages, particularly in the context of their upcoming use of Maple.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Maple is better for various tasks, including symbolic manipulation and solving ODEs and PDEs, while others argue that Mathematica is superior in symbolic integration.
  • One participant notes a difference in syntax between the two programs, specifically that Maple requires a semicolon at the end of commands and uses a different notation for functions.
  • Another participant describes Maple as being more "snippy" with command input compared to Mathematica, which they found more enjoyable for certain tasks.
  • One contributor states that while Mathematica is more powerful overall, Maple is easier to use for calculus-related tasks.
  • A participant mentions their bias towards Maple due to their university's support for it, highlighting its straightforwardness for calculus and linear algebra.
  • Another participant expresses that they have used both extensively but do not have a strong preference for either software.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions, with no clear consensus on which software is definitively better. Some favor Maple for its ease of use in specific contexts, while others advocate for Mathematica's overall power.

Contextual Notes

Participants' preferences may depend on their specific tasks, familiarity with the software, and educational background, which could influence their experiences and opinions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or professionals considering which software to use for symbolic manipulation, ODE, and PDE tasks, particularly those transitioning to a university environment that emphasizes Maple.

graphic7
Gold Member
Messages
450
Reaction score
2
Next year I'll be changing to a university that mainly utilizes Maple over Mathematica. I've heard Maple is better for various tasks, such as symbolic manipulation, ODE, and PDE solving. However, I've also heard that Mathematica is superior in the field of symbolic integration. I've only used Mathematica (versions 4 and 5), and I'm rather curious about Maple (since I will be using it this upcoming year). I just wanted just input from people that have Maple and/or Mathematica.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have used maple often but I have only used mathematica once or twice. I cannot see much difference. A difference that will irritate you a bit is that you must end with a ; and you cannot write sin(2x) you have to write
sin(2*x).
 
It's been several years since I've used it, but to me it seemed that Maple was much more "snippy" when it comes to inputting commands.

I used Mathematica for the first time last semester and I loved it. Unfortunately, matrices and data manipulation weren't streamlined enough for my tastes, so I'm back to using MATLAB, mostly.
 
Last edited:
Mathematica is actually much more powerful than Maple, but it really depends on what you intend to do with it. If you're just doing calculus, Maple's easier to work with.

- Warren
 
As an engineer i use maple and MATLAB lots.
Maybe I'm a little biased because my school helps develop it with waterloo so it's unofficially taught but it's pretty nice and straight forward for calculus and linear algebra. I usually find that if I'm going to use mathematica i might as well use matlab.

The latest version of maple adds a ";" for you.
 
I have used both extensively, and I don't have a strong preference for one over the other.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
46K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K