Calculating Fourier Transform of Unit Step Function

electronic engineer
Messages
145
Reaction score
3
how can I calculate the Fourier transform for unit step function:

v(t)=1 where 0=<t<+infinity

v(t)=0 otherwise

I applied the general definition relation for FT:

v(w)=integral(v(t)*e^-jwt) ; - infinity<t<+infinity

but i had v(w)=infinity due to the term infinity-displaced e^(+jwt) so that's wrong of course!

I think we could divide this function into two functions for example:

v'(t)=1/2 ; t of all values

v''(t)=1/2 ; 0=<t<+infinity
v''(t)=-1/2; -infinity<t<0

so we notice v(t)=v'(t)+v''(t)

I don't know what to do , could anyone help!

thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your v(t) does not have a Fourier transform. When functions like this are encountered in practice, Laplace transform is used instead (You need to describe the application you are working on that needs this transform).
 
The Fourier transform of the Heaviside step function doesn't exist as a function. It does, however, exist as a (somewhat nasty) distribution that involves the the Dirac delta "function".

Regards,
George
 
George Jones said:
The Fourier transform of the Heaviside step function doesn't exist as a function. It does, however, exist as a (somewhat nasty) distribution that involves the the Dirac delta "function".

Regards,
George

thanks.Anyway could you clarify more, how did you deduct that Heaviside step function exists as Dirac delta function and how can we describe that distribution practically on diagram
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top