Calculating Fourier Transform of Unit Step Function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on calculating the Fourier transform of the unit step function, specifically the Heaviside step function, and explores the challenges associated with this calculation. Participants consider both theoretical and practical implications of the Fourier transform in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to calculate the Fourier transform using the general definition but encounters issues with the result being infinite.
  • Another participant suggests that the Fourier transform does not exist for the unit step function and recommends using the Laplace transform instead, asking for clarification on the application context.
  • A third participant states that while the Fourier transform of the Heaviside step function does not exist as a function, it can be represented as a distribution involving the Dirac delta function.
  • A later reply requests clarification on how the connection between the Heaviside step function and the Dirac delta function is established and how this distribution can be practically represented on a diagram.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence of the Fourier transform for the unit step function, with some asserting it does not exist as a function while others explore its representation as a distribution. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the practical implications and representations of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations related to the assumptions made about the applicability of Fourier transforms versus Laplace transforms, as well as the nature of distributions in relation to the Heaviside step function.

electronic engineer
Messages
145
Reaction score
3
how can I calculate the Fourier transform for unit step function:

v(t)=1 where 0=<t<+infinity

v(t)=0 otherwise

I applied the general definition relation for FT:

v(w)=integral(v(t)*e^-jwt) ; - infinity<t<+infinity

but i had v(w)=infinity due to the term infinity-displaced e^(+jwt) so that's wrong of course!

I think we could divide this function into two functions for example:

v'(t)=1/2 ; t of all values

v''(t)=1/2 ; 0=<t<+infinity
v''(t)=-1/2; -infinity<t<0

so we notice v(t)=v'(t)+v''(t)

I don't know what to do , could anyone help!

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your v(t) does not have a Fourier transform. When functions like this are encountered in practice, Laplace transform is used instead (You need to describe the application you are working on that needs this transform).
 
The Fourier transform of the Heaviside step function doesn't exist as a function. It does, however, exist as a (somewhat nasty) distribution that involves the the Dirac delta "function".

Regards,
George
 
George Jones said:
The Fourier transform of the Heaviside step function doesn't exist as a function. It does, however, exist as a (somewhat nasty) distribution that involves the the Dirac delta "function".

Regards,
George

thanks.Anyway could you clarify more, how did you deduct that Heaviside step function exists as Dirac delta function and how can we describe that distribution practically on diagram
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K